A C Testa1, M Ludovisi1, L Savelli2, E Fruscella1, T Ghi2, A Fagotti3, G Scambia3, G Ferrandina1. 1. Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 3. Department of Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Campobasso, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze prospectively the ability of ultrasound to detect metastatic omentum in patients with suspicious pelvic masses and to describe the sonographic features of metastatic omental disease. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-four patients were evaluated preoperatively by ultrasound examination and of these 173 were used in the analysis. We defined as an ultrasound-positive examination one which visualized intra-abdominal aperistaltic solid tissue, located above the bowel loops and below the anterior peritoneal surface. Preoperative sonographic findings were compared with pathological results. RESULTS: Sonographic detection of metastatic omentum was achieved in 104 of 173 patients (60.1%), appearing as either solid aperistaltic tissue (80.8% of cases), or as solid discrete nodules (19.2%). When considering the echostructure of the surrounding bowel loops, this tissue appeared hypoechoic in 46 (44.2%) cases and isoechoic or slightly hyperechoic in the other 58 (55.8%) cases. In the overall series, the negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) and the accuracy of ultrasound examination were 92.7%, 91.3% and 91.9%, respectively. When considering only the group of ovarian tumors, the NPV, PPV and accuracy were 91.9%, 94.6%, and 93.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound examination is highly accurate in detecting metastatic omental involvement in cases with suspicious pelvic masses.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze prospectively the ability of ultrasound to detect metastatic omentum in patients with suspicious pelvic masses and to describe the sonographic features of metastatic omental disease. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-four patients were evaluated preoperatively by ultrasound examination and of these 173 were used in the analysis. We defined as an ultrasound-positive examination one which visualized intra-abdominal aperistaltic solid tissue, located above the bowel loops and below the anterior peritoneal surface. Preoperative sonographic findings were compared with pathological results. RESULTS: Sonographic detection of metastatic omentum was achieved in 104 of 173 patients (60.1%), appearing as either solid aperistaltic tissue (80.8% of cases), or as solid discrete nodules (19.2%). When considering the echostructure of the surrounding bowel loops, this tissue appeared hypoechoic in 46 (44.2%) cases and isoechoic or slightly hyperechoic in the other 58 (55.8%) cases. In the overall series, the negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) and the accuracy of ultrasound examination were 92.7%, 91.3% and 91.9%, respectively. When considering only the group of ovarian tumors, the NPV, PPV and accuracy were 91.9%, 94.6%, and 93.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound examination is highly accurate in detecting metastatic omental involvement in cases with suspicious pelvic masses.
Authors: Amjad Alhyari; Christian Görg; Christoph Frank Dietrich; Corrina Trenker; Lena Strauch; Ehsan Safai Zadeh Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2022-05