Literature DB >> 16374689

Can pediatric residents interpret electrocardiograms?

C S Snyder1, J T Bricker, A L Fenrich, R A Friedman, G L Rosenthal, C L Johnsrude, C Kertesz, N J Kertesz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation skills of pediatric residents in a controlled environment and determine if the level of residency training (intern vs senior) improves accuracy. A list of ECG diagnoses was provided to four pediatric residency educators with instructions to categorize each diagnosis as follows: I, all residents; II, the majority of residents, including all senior residents; III, less than the majority of residents; and IV, few residents should be able to interpret correctly. Only those categories that the entire panel believed all residents (category I) or all senior residents (category II) should be able to interpret correctly were included. The test included 17 ECGs: 14 category I and 3 category II. A total of 132 residents participated: 78 interns and 54 seniors. Both groups scored below expected levels. Mean correct score among seniors was 10.9 out of the expected 17 (p < 0.001). Mean correct score for interns was 7.7 out of the expected 14 (p < 0.00l). No difference in ECG interpretation accuracy was found between residency programs. In general, pediatric residents' ECG interpretation skills are less accurate than expected. Although there is a trend toward improvement during training, senior residents fell short of the expectations of the panel. We speculate that focused education in this area will improve resident ECG interpretation and benefit patient care by (1) facilitating referral and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease and (2) decreasing referrals for erroneous interpretations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16374689     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-004-0759-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.

Authors:  D Woolley; M Henck; J Luck
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Electrocardiographic training in primary care residency programs.

Authors:  R E Pinkerton; C K Francis; K A Ljungquist; G W Howe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?

Authors:  C S Snyder; A L Fenrich; R A Friedman; C Macias; K O'Reilly; N J Kertesz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Use of the electrocardiogram in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  L A Horton; S Mosee; J Brenner
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1994-02
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Electrocardiogram interpretation by Canadian general paediatricians: Examining practice, accuracy and confidence.

Authors:  Carolina A Escudero; Shubhayan Sanatani; Kenny K Wong; Christina G Templeton
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents.

Authors:  Michael Crocetti; Reid Thompson
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-01

3.  Does level of training influence the ability to detect hepatosplenomegaly in children with leukemia?

Authors:  Donna L Johnston; Janelle Cyr
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2012-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.