Literature DB >> 16373804

Biphasic cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.

G K Lo1, D M Fatovich, A D Haig.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a trend towards accelerated management of acute atrial fibrillation (AF) in the emergency department (ED). We report our experience with biphasic cardioversion of acute AF.
METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive study at a tertiary hospital ED over a 6 month period. Acute AF was defined as symptoms that had been present for <48 hours. Patients who received biphasic cardioversion for acute AF in the ED were enrolled. Data collected included: patient demographics, past medical history, details of biphasic cardioversion, outcome, complications, disposition, and length of stay.
RESULTS: There were 34 attempts at cardioversion in 33 patients. The mean (SD) age was 56 (16) years and 21 patients (64%) were men. Biphasic cardioversion was successful in 31 attempts (91%). In 24 attempts (71%), 100 J was selected as the initial energy level. This was successful in 21 attempts (88%). There were three minor complications related to sedation. The mean (SD) length of stay was 5.6 (2.8) hours in the ED and 15 (25) hours in the hospital. The three patients who failed to revert were older (mean age 64 years), had underlying cardiovascular disease, and spent longer in hospital (50 v 12 hours, p = 0.01). Telephone follow up was conducted with 32 patients (97%) at 3 months. Recurrence of AF occurred in 7 patients (22%). Most patients (31, 97%) were satisfied with the biphasic cardioversion.
CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic cardioversion of acute AF is effective. The majority of patients can be managed as outpatients, and there is very high patient satisfaction with this approach. An initial shock energy level of 100 J is usually effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16373804      PMCID: PMC2564129          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.021055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Isabelle C Van Gelder; Vincent E Hagens; Hans A Bosker; J Herre Kingma; Otto Kamp; Tsjerk Kingma; Salah A Said; Julius I Darmanata; Alphons J M Timmermans; Jan G P Tijssen; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Electrical cardioversion of emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  John H Burton; David R Vinson; Kate Drummond; Tania D Strout; Henry C Thode; Jeff J McInturff
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Risk for clinical thromboembolism associated with conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation lasting less than 48 hours.

Authors:  M J Weigner; T A Caulfield; P G Danias; D I Silverman; W J Manning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  An emergency department observation unit protocol for acute-onset atrial fibrillation is feasible.

Authors:  Benjamin O Koenig; Michael A Ross; Raymond E Jackson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.

Authors:  J A Michael; I G Stiell; S Agarwal; D P Mandavia
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Termination of recent-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter in the emergency department: a sequential approach with intravenous ibutilide and external electrical cardioversion.

Authors:  H Domanovits; M Schillinger; J Thoennissen; M Nikfardjam; K Janata; M Brunner; A N Laggner
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an emergency department-based atrial fibrillation treatment strategy with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Authors:  Michael H Kim; Fred Morady; Barbara Conlon; Steven Kronick; Mark Lowell; David Bruckman; William F Armstrong; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:.

Authors:  Yaariv Khaykin; David Newman; Marnie Kowalewski; Victoria Korley; Paul Dorian
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-08

9.  Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Scholten; T Szili-Torok; P Klootwijk; L Jordaens
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

  9 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Focus on recent-onset atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Andrea Tampieri; Anna Maria Rusconi; Tiziano Lenzi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Management and Disposition of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Justin L Vandermolen; Murrium I Sadaf; Anil K Gehi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30

3.  "Wait and see" approach to the emergency department cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Brian Doyle; Mark Reeves
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.112

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.