BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ABC/2 formula is a reliable estimation technique of intracerebral hematoma volume. However, oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT)-related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared with primary ICH is based on a different pathophysiological mechanism, and various shapes of hematomas are more likely to occur. Our objective was to validate the ABC/2 technique based on analyses of the hematoma shapes in OAT-related ICH. METHODS: We reviewed the computed tomography scans of 83 patients with OAT-associated intraparenchymal ICH. Location was divided into deep, lobar, cerebellar, and brain stem hemorrhage. Shape of the ICH was divided into (A) round-to-ellipsoid, (B) irregular with frayed margins, and (C) multinodular to separated. The ABC/2 technique was compared with computer-assisted planimetric analyses with regard to hematoma site and shape. RESULTS: The mean hematoma volume was 40.83+/-3.9 cm3 (ABC/2) versus 36.6+/-3.5 cm3 (planimetric analysis). Bland-Altman plots suggested equivalence of both estimation techniques, especially for smaller ICH volumes. The most frequent location was a deep hemorrhage (54%), followed by lobar (21%), cerebellar (14%) and brain stem hemorrhage (11%). The most common shape was round-to-ellipsoid (44%), followed by irregular ICH (31%) and separated and multinodular shapes (25%). In the latter, ABC/2 formula significantly overestimated volume by +32.1% (round shapes by +6.7%; irregular shapes by +14.9%; P ANOVA <0.01). Variation of the denominator toward ABC/3 in cases of irregularly and separately shaped hematomas revealed more a precise volume estimation with a deviation of -10.3% in irregular and +5.6% in separately shaped hematomas. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with OAT-related ICH, >50% of bleedings are irregularly shaped. In these cases, hematoma volume is significantly overestimated by the ABC/2 formula. Modification of the denominator to 3 (ie, ABC/3) measured ICH volume more accurately in these patients potentially facilitating treatment decisions.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ABC/2 formula is a reliable estimation technique of intracerebral hematoma volume. However, oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT)-related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared with primary ICH is based on a different pathophysiological mechanism, and various shapes of hematomas are more likely to occur. Our objective was to validate the ABC/2 technique based on analyses of the hematoma shapes in OAT-related ICH. METHODS: We reviewed the computed tomography scans of 83 patients with OAT-associated intraparenchymal ICH. Location was divided into deep, lobar, cerebellar, and brain stem hemorrhage. Shape of the ICH was divided into (A) round-to-ellipsoid, (B) irregular with frayed margins, and (C) multinodular to separated. The ABC/2 technique was compared with computer-assisted planimetric analyses with regard to hematoma site and shape. RESULTS: The mean hematoma volume was 40.83+/-3.9 cm3 (ABC/2) versus 36.6+/-3.5 cm3 (planimetric analysis). Bland-Altman plots suggested equivalence of both estimation techniques, especially for smaller ICH volumes. The most frequent location was a deep hemorrhage (54%), followed by lobar (21%), cerebellar (14%) and brain stem hemorrhage (11%). The most common shape was round-to-ellipsoid (44%), followed by irregular ICH (31%) and separated and multinodular shapes (25%). In the latter, ABC/2 formula significantly overestimated volume by +32.1% (round shapes by +6.7%; irregular shapes by +14.9%; P ANOVA <0.01). Variation of the denominator toward ABC/3 in cases of irregularly and separately shaped hematomas revealed more a precise volume estimation with a deviation of -10.3% in irregular and +5.6% in separately shaped hematomas. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with OAT-related ICH, >50% of bleedings are irregularly shaped. In these cases, hematoma volume is significantly overestimated by the ABC/2 formula. Modification of the denominator to 3 (ie, ABC/3) measured ICH volume more accurately in these patients potentially facilitating treatment decisions.
Authors: Karl Lindberg; Angelica Kouti; Doerthe Ziegelitz; Tobias Hallén; Thomas Skoglund; Dan Farahmand Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-01-19
Authors: Jillian E Urban; Christopher T Whitlow; Colston A Edgerton; Alexander K Powers; Joseph A Maldjian; Joel D Stitzel Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Matthias Reinhard; Florian Neunhoeffer; Thomas A Gerds; Wolf-Dirk Niesen; Klaus-Juergen Buttler; Jens Timmer; Bernhard Schmidt; Marek Czosnyka; Cornelius Weiller; Andreas Hetzel Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: M Luby; J Hong; J G Merino; J K Lynch; A W Hsia; A Magadán; S S Song; L L Latour; S Warach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Letourneau-Guillon; T Huynh; R Jakobovic; R Milwid; S P Symons; R I Aviv Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Timothy C Morgan; Jesse Dawson; Danielle Spengler; Kennedy R Lees; Chanel Aldrich; Nishant K Mishra; Karen Lane; Terence J Quinn; Marie Diener-West; Christopher J Weir; Peter Higgins; Mark Rafferty; Katie Kinsley; Wendy Ziai; Issam Awad; Matthew R Walters; Daniel Hanley Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 7.914