Literature DB >> 16373526

Brief report on the experience of using proxy consent for incapacitated adults.

S Mason1, H Barrow, A Phillips, G Eddison, A Nelson, N Cullum, J Nixon.   

Abstract

The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, which came into force in the UK in May 2004, cover the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products. They allow a legal representative (a person not connected with the conduct of the trial) to consent to the participation of incompetent adults in medical research. Currently, very little is known about how such representatives will make their decisions. We have experience with proxy consent for older adults in a large, national trial. From 2445 potentially eligible but incapacitated patients, proxy, relative assent resulted in trial participation of only 87 (3.6%) patients. The reasons for this were that a large number of incapacitated patients had no relative available for assent (2286), but also a high proportion of relatives approached refused to provide assent (72/159, 45.3%). In comparison, 17.7% of patients declined participation in the trial.Proxy consent allowed only a small increase in trial recruitment of incapacitated patients. The fact that a greater proportion of relatives than patients refused to provide assent implies that they were more cautious than the patients themselves, or perhaps used different criteria, when making their decision. In future research involving incapacitated older patients there is likely to be heavy reliance on proxy consent provision by legal representatives. Our findings imply that consent decisions of legal representatives will not necessarily reflect those of patients themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16373526      PMCID: PMC2563273          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.012302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cancer in old age--is it inadequately investigated and treated?

Authors:  N J Turner; R A Haward; G P Mulley; P J Selby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

Review 2.  A nurse-led randomised trial of pressure-relieving support surfaces.

Authors:  E Andrea Nelson; Jane Nixon; Su Mason; Helen Barrow; Angela Phillips; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  2003-05

3.  Another threat to research in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Richard Nicholson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-22

4.  Selecting participants when testing new drugs: the implications of age and gender discrimination.

Authors:  Pamela R Ferguson
Journal:  Med Leg J       Date:  2002

Review 5.  Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research.

Authors:  J Sugarman; D C McCrory; R C Hubal
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  Selecting subjects for participation in clinical research: one sphere of justice.

Authors:  C Weijer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Informed consent in emergency research: a contradiction in terms.

Authors:  Malcolm G Booth
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  ICU research: the impact of invasiveness on informed consent.

Authors:  Fabienne Gigon; Paolo Merlani; Catherine Chenaud; Bara Ricou
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement).

Authors:  C J Evans; E Yorganci; P Lewis; J Koffman; K Stone; I Tunnard; B Wee; W Bernal; M Hotopf; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  Karla Diazordaz; Anne-Marie Slowther; Rachel Potter; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A prospective descriptive study on prevalence of catatonia and correlates in an acute mental health unit in Nelson Mandela Bay, South Africa.

Authors:  Zukiswa Zingela; Louise Stroud; Johan Cronje; Max Fink; Stephan Van Wyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Safety and Feasibility Assessment of Repetitive Vascular Occlusion Stimulus (RVOS) Application to Multi-Organ Failure Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ismita Chhetri; Julie E A Hunt; Jeewaka R Mendis; Lui G Forni; Justin Kirk-Bayley; Ian White; Jonathan Cooper; Karthik Somasundaram; Nikunj Shah; Stephen D Patterson; Zudin A Puthucheary; Hugh E Montgomery; Benedict C Creagh-Brown
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Development of a measure to assess the quality of proxy decisions about research participation on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent: the Combined Scale for Proxy Informed Consent Decisions (CONCORD scale).

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd; Kerenza Hood; Katie Gillies; Fiona Wood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 8.  Medical research in emergency research in the European Union member states: tensions between theory and practice.

Authors:  Erwin J O Kompanje; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Jozef Kesecioglu
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of negative pressure wound therapy to treat grade III/IV pressure ulcers [ISRCTN69032034].

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Elizabeth McGinnis; Nikki Stubbs; David J Torgerson; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Protocol for a prospective descriptive prevalence study of catatonia in an acute mental health unit in urban South Africa.

Authors:  Zukiswa Zingela; Louise Stroud; Johan Cronje; Max Fink; Stephanus van Wyk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.