Literature DB >> 16373409

Timing luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/embryo transfer cycles.

Monique H Mochtar1, Madelon Van Wely, Fulco Van der Veen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different times of onset of luteal phase support on ongoing pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing treatment with GnRH down-regulated IVF and embryo transfer (IVF/ET).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive eligible patients planned to undergo their first IVF treatment cycle were randomly allocated to receive vaginal progesterone as luteal support at three different time points, that is, after HCG administration for final oocyte maturation (HCG group), at the day of oocyte retrieval (OR group) or at the day of ET (ET group). The primary endpoint of this study was ongoing pregnancy rate.
RESULTS: A total of 385 women were randomized, 130 were allocated to the HCG group, 128 to the OR group and 127 to the ET group. An ongoing pregnancy rate of 20.8% was found in the HCG group versus 22.7 and 23.6% in the OR group and ET group, respectively. The mean number and quality of the retrieved oocytes and the transferred embryos did not differ.
CONCLUSION: Based on this data, an 18% difference in ongoing pregnancy rate between the three different times of onset of luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/ET cycles can be refuted. Smaller clinically meaningful differences may be present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16373409     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

Review 1.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Progesterone and the luteal phase: a requisite to reproduction.

Authors:  Tolga B Mesen; Steven L Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 3.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 4.  The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Ru Liu; Hua-Qiao Mu; Qi Shi; Xiao-Qiu Xiao; Hong-Bo Qi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Vaginal micronized progesterone capsule versus vaginal progesterone gel for lutheal support in normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles.

Authors:  Kenan Sofuoglu; Ismet Gun; Sadik Sahin; Okan Ozden; Oktay Tosun; Mustafa Eroglu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles.

Authors:  H M Fatemi
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

7.  A 10-year follow-up on the practice of luteal phase support using worldwide web-based surveys.

Authors:  Gon Shoham; Milton Leong; Ariel Weissman
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Christopher A Jones; Kevin Doody; Russell Foulk; Bill Yee; G David Adamson; Barbara Cometti; Gary DeVane; Gary Hubert; Silvia Trevisan; Fred Hoehler; Clarence Jones; Michael Soules
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.

Authors:  Federica Di Guardo; Habib Midassi; Annalisa Racca; Herman Tournaye; Michel De Vos; Christophe Blockeel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.