Literature DB >> 16373250

Relationship of body fat distribution by waist circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasonography to insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment and lipid profile in obese and non-obese postmenopausal women.

Roberto Euzebio dos Santos1, José Mendes Aldrighi, José Ramón Lanz, Pollyanna C Ferezin, Marilia M S Marone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To correlate body fat distribution evaluated by waist circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasonography to insulin resistance and lipid profile in obese and non-obese postmenopausal women.
METHODS: We studied 40 obese and 47 non-obese postmenopausal women, assessing obesity by measuring waist circumference and fat tissue using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasonography, and examining their correlation with metabolic parameters: insulin resistance as determined by the homeostasis model assessment technique (HOMA-IR) and lipid profile including triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), very-low-density lipoprotein, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and apoplipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I).
RESULTS: There was no difference in lipid profile between the two groups. Insulin resistance was the metabolic disturbance of highest prevalence in the obese group, evaluated by HOMA-IR (obese: 3.38 +/- 2.2; non-obese: 1.20 +/- 0.7; p < 0.001). Obesity was not a confounding factor in linear regression analyses among HOMA-IR, HDL-C, TG, Lp(a), Apo A-I and the methods used to measure body fat distribution. Waist circumference was the method that best explained HOMA-IR (R(2) = 34.9%, p < 0.001) and TG concentration (R(2) = 10.9%, p = 0.002). HDL-C presented a positive association with subcutaneous fat evaluated by ultrasonography (R(2) = 12.5%, p < 0.001). Obesity was a confounding factor in multiple regression analyses between TC and LDL-C, when related to abdominal fat evaluated by ultrasonography, and resulted in a positive association among the obese and a negative association among the non-obese women. The sensibility of this method was related to the quantity of fat in the visceral region.
CONCLUSIONS: Waist circumference showed the highest association with insulin resistance. Fat distribution evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasound was also associated with insulin resistance, but with lower intensity. The relationship of visceral fat distribution evaluated by ultrasound to TC cholesterol and LDL-C showed opposed results between obese and non-obese menopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16373250     DOI: 10.1080/09513590500361937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  5 in total

1.  Centrally located body fat is associated with lower bone mineral density in older Puerto Rican adults.

Authors:  Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Marian T Hannan; Alice H Lichtenstein; Katherine L Tucker
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Sex differences in the association of regional fat distribution with the severity of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Laila Simpson; Sutapa Mukherjee; Matthew N Cooper; Kim L Ward; Jessica D Lee; Annette C Fedson; Jane Potter; David R Hillman; David R Hillman Fanzca; Peter Eastwood; Lyle J Palmer; Jason Kirkness
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Longitudinal association of anthropometric measures of adiposity with cardiometabolic risk factors in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Kabat; Moonseong Heo; Linda V Van Horn; Rasa Kazlauskaite; Asqual Getaneh; Jamy Ard; Mara Z Vitolins; Molly E Waring; Oleg Zaslavsky; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Thomas E Rohan
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric and anthropometric measures of adiposity in relation to adiposity-related biologic factors.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Rob M van Dam; Donna Spiegelman; Steven B Heymsfield; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Assessing Body Fat Changes during Moderate Weight Loss with Anthropometry and Bioelectrical Impedance.

Authors:  Muhammad Aslam; Aaron W Eckhauser; Cindy A Dorminy; Cynthia M Dossett; Leena Choi; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.288

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.