Literature DB >> 16372169

Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movements.

Luc P J Selen1, Peter J Beek, Jaap H van Dieën.   

Abstract

The neuromuscular system is inherently noisy and joint impedance may serve to filter this noise. In the present experiment, we investigated whether individuals modulate joint impedance to meet spatial accuracy demands. Twelve subjects were instructed to make rapid, time constrained, elbow extensions to three differently sized targets. Some trials (20 out of 140 for each target, randomly assigned) were perturbed mechanically at 75% of movement amplitude. Inertia, damping and stiffness were estimated from the torque and angle deviation signal using a forward simulation and optimization routine. Increases in endpoint accuracy were not always reflected in a decrease in trajectory variability. Only in the final quarter of the trajectory the variability decreased as target width decreased. Stiffness estimates increased significantly with accuracy constraints. Damping estimates only increased for perturbations that were initially directed against the movement direction. We concluded that joint impedance modulation is one of the strategies used by the neuromuscular system to generate accurate movements, at least during the final part of the movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16372169     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0320-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Minoru Shinohara; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study.

Authors:  Luc P J Selen; Peter J Beek; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement.

Authors:  D J Bennett; J M Hollerbach; Y Xu; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: a theoretical perspective.

Authors:  A W Van Gemmert; G P Van Galen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics.

Authors:  R E Kearney; R B Stein; L Parameswaran
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Error, stress and the role of neuromotor noise in space oriented behaviour.

Authors:  G P van Galen; M van Huygevoort
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  29 in total

1.  Postural constraints on movement variability.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Co-contraction modifies the stretch reflex elicited in muscles shortened by a joint perturbation.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Colum D MacKinnon; Randy Trumbower; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of cocontraction in the impairment of movement accuracy with fatigue.

Authors:  Olivier Missenard; Denis Mottet; Stephane Perrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Submovements during pointing movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Laetitia Fradet; Gyusung Lee; Berta C Leis; Charles H Adler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The influence of visual perturbations on the neural control of limb stiffness.

Authors:  Jeremy Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Nicole Malfait; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-03-25

8.  Development of a mechatronic platform and validation of methods for estimating ankle stiffness during the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  Elliott J Rouse; Levi J Hargrove; Eric J Perreault; Michael A Peshkin; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Origins of submovements during pointing movements.

Authors:  Laetitia Fradet; Gyusung Lee; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-11

10.  Brain-machine interfaces and transcranial stimulation: future implications for directing functional movement and improving function after spinal injury in humans.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.