Literature DB >> 16371901

Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages.

Raj D Rao1, Kenny S David, Mei Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical evaluation of anterior cages in a calf lumbar spine model.
OBJECTIVES: To determine changes in spinal motion and intradiscal pressures at immediately adjacent lumbar motion segments following anterior insertion of tapered cages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an effective approach in the treatment of discogenic low back pain. A tapered lumbar (LT) cage design attempts to restore physiologic lordosis and sagittal balance. We are not aware of any previous biomechanical evaluation of the effects of LT cages on adjacent motion segments.
METHODS: Nine fresh calf spines (L2-L5) were procured for the study. Pure moments (up to 8.5 Nm) in flexion, extension, and lateral bending were applied to the L2 vertebra in five steps through a nonconstrained loading system. With each step of loading, three-dimensional rotation at three intervertebral disc levels was obtained through a three-camera motion analysis system, and intradiscal pressures within the nucleus pulposus of the two nonoperated discs were measured with miniature transducers. The spines were tested initially intact and following paired anterior LT cage insertion.
RESULTS: Following ALIF, small to moderate increase in motion was found at both adjacent segments in flexion (superior: 12.5%, P < 0.05; inferior: 11.3%, P < 0.02) and lateral bending (superior: 7.8%, P < 0.02; inferior: 6.6%, P < 0.02). An increase in intradiscal pressure was noted at the superior adjacent segment under flexion (21%, P < 0.01) and lateral bending (16%, P < 0.03). Intradiscal pressure changes at the inferior adjacent level were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant changes in intradiscal pressures and motion were found at the adjacent levels following a single-level stand-alone ALIF procedure using paired LT cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16371901     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190813.27468.2d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The fate of adjacent segments with pre-existing degeneration after lumbar posterolateral fusion: the influence of degenerative grading.

Authors:  Chao Li; Qing He; Yong Tang; Dike Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Naresh Parvathreddy; Sujitha Sampath; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

4.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?

Authors:  A Kettler; L Liakos; B Haegele; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The LP-ESP(®) lumbar disc prosthesis with 6 degrees of freedom: development and 7 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Alain Aaron; Adrien Brusson; Jean-Patrick Rakover; Marc-Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-01-11

7.  Postero-lateral disc prosthesis combined with a unilateral facet replacement device maintains quantity and quality of motion at a single lumbar level.

Authors:  Aniruddh N Nayak; Michael C Doarn; Roger B Gaskins; Chris R James; Andres F Cabezas; Antonio E Castellvi; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Medium-term effects of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Haiting Wu; Qingjiang Pang; Guoqiang Jiang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Breakdown in Polysegmental Thoracolumbar Fusions of Three or More Levels with Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Edward P Abraham; Neil A Manson; Melissa D McKeon
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-02-25

10.  Superior Facet Joint Violations during Single Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Long Jia; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Fuping Li; Rui Zhu; Zhili Zeng; Liming Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.