Literature DB >> 16371542

Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablation: simultaneous production of separate zones of coagulation in an in vivo porcine liver model.

Paul F Laeseke1, Lisa A Sampson, Dieter Haemmerich, Chris L Brace, Jason P Fine, Tina M Frey, Thomas C Winter, Fred T Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A multiple-electrode radiofrequency (RF) system was developed based on switching between electrodes that allows for the simultaneous use of as many as three electrically independent electrodes. The purpose of this study was to determine if each multiple-electrode ablation zone is identical to an ablation zone created with conventional single-electrode mode.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine female domestic pigs (mean weight, 90 kg) were used for this study. A prototype monopolar multiple-electrode RF ablation system was created with use of an RF generator and an electronic switching algorithm. A maximum of three electrodes can be used simultaneously by switching between electrodes at each impedance spike (30 omega greater than baseline levels). A total of 39 zones of ablation were created at open laparotomy in pig livers with use of a conventional single electrode (n = 9), two single electrodes simultaneously (n = 6 ablations; 12 ablation zones), or three single electrodes simultaneously (n = 6 ablations; 18 ablation zones). RF electrodes were spaced in separate lobes of the liver when multiple zones of coagulation were created simultaneously. Animals were euthanized after RF ablation, livers were removed, and ablation zones were sectioned and measured.
RESULTS: Zones of coagulation created simultaneously with two or three electrodes were equivalent to ablation zones created with use of conventional single-electrode ablation. No significant differences were observed among control animals treated with a single electrode, those with two separate zones of ablation created simultaneously, and those with three simultaneously created ablation zones in terms of mean (+/-SD) minimum diameter (1.6 cm +/- 0.6, 1.6 cm +/- 0.5, and 1.7 cm +/- 0.4, respectively), maximum diameter (2.0 cm +/- 0.5, 2.3 cm +/- 0.5, 2.2 cm +/- 0.5, respectively), and volume (6.7 cm3 +/- 3.7, 7.4 cm3 +/- 3.8, and 7.8 cm3 +/- 3.9; P > .30, analysis of variance, pairwise t-test comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: A rapid-switching multiple-electrode RF system was able to simultaneously create as many as three separate ablation zones of equivalent size compared with single-electrode controls. This system would allow physicians to simultaneously treat multiple tumors, substantially reducing procedure time and anesthesia risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16371542     DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.000018362.17771.b0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  9 in total

1.  Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Reto Bale; Gerlig Widmann; Peter Schullian; Marion Haidu; Georg Pall; Alexander Klaus; Helmut Weiss; Matthias Biebl; Raimund Margreiter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Microwave ablation with a single small-gauge triaxial antenna: in vivo porcine liver model.

Authors:  Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Lisa A Sampson; Tina M Frey; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Switching bipolar hepatic radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes: comparison with consecutive monopolar and switching monopolar modes.

Authors:  J H Yoon; J M Lee; S Woo; E J Hwang; I Hwang; W Choi; J K Han; B I Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Thermal ablation of lung tumors.

Authors:  P David Sonntag; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  Radiofrequency ablation: simultaneous application of multiple electrodes via switching creates larger, more confluent ablations than sequential application in a large animal model.

Authors:  Christopher L Brace; Lisa A Sampson; J Louis Hinshaw; Neil Sandhu; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation--what should you use and why?

Authors:  J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Tumour ablation: technical aspects.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Gerd Bodner; Reto Bale
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Numerical study of the influence of water evaporation on radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Qing Zhu; Yuanyuan Shen; Aili Zhang; Lisa X Xu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a dual-switching system and a separable clustered electrode: evaluation of the in vivo efficiency.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Eui Jin Hwang; In Pyung Hwang; Jeehyun Baek; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.