Literature DB >> 16371533

Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of survival rates with different embolic agents.

Daniel B Brown1, Thomas K Pilgram, Michael D Darcy, Christopher E Fundakowski, Mauricio Lisker-Melman, William C Chapman, Jeffrey S Crippin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The optimal embolic agent for transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been identified. This study reports outcomes of TACE for HCC with Gelfoam powder and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients underwent 152 TACE sessions with Gelfoam powder (n = 41) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and Ethiodol (n = 40) as the embolic agent. Chemotherapeutic drugs were the same for all patients (50 mg cisplatin, 20 mg doxorubicin, 10 mg mitomycin-c). The groups were compared based on number of TACE sessions, maximum tumor size, bilirubin level, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase levels, Child-Pugh score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and hepatitis B or C virus positivity. The number of cases of each Child class in each group was also evaluated. Survival starting from the first TACE session was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forty-eight patients died during the study period, 19 received transplants, and 14 were alive at the end of the study period.
RESULTS: The groups were statistically similar in all categories regarding liver function, Child-Pugh score, tumor size, hepatitis status, and percentage of patients with Child class A, B, and C disease. The number of TACE sessions was significantly greater for the Gelfoam powder group (mean, 2.2) versus the PVA group (mean, 1.6; P = .01). Overall survival was similar between groups whether patients who received transplants were included in the analysis (mean, 659 days +/- 83 with Gelfoam powder vs 565 days +/- 71 with PVA; P = .42) or were excluded (mean, 519 days +/- 80 with Gelfoam powder vs 511 days +/- 75 with PVA; P = .93).
CONCLUSION: In similar patient groups, survival after treatment of HCC with TACE with Gelfoam powder or PVA and Ethiodol was similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16371533     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000182160.26798.A2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  24 in total

1.  Austrian Joint ÖGGH-ÖGIR-ÖGHO-ASSO position statement on the use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Wolfgang Sieghart; Claus Kölblinger; Markus Reiter; Martin Schindl; Gregor Ulbrich; Rudolf Steininger; Christian Müller; Rudolf Stauber; Maximilian Schöniger-Hekele; Manfred Gschwendtner; Christina Plank; Martin Funovics; Ivo Graziadei; Johannes Lammer; Thomas Gruenberger; Günther Gastl; Franz Karnel
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Clinical trial of cisplatin-conjugated gelatin microspheres for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tetsuya Toyama; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ohta; Toyohiko Tanaka; Yukihiro Nagatani; Masashi Takahashi; Kiyoshi Murata; Hisanori Shiomi; Shigeyuki Naka; Yoshimasa Kurumi; Tohru Tani; Yasuhiko Tabata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Locoregional drug delivery using image-guided intra-arterial drug eluting bead therapy.

Authors:  Andrew L Lewis; Matthew R Dreher
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Byrne; Jorge Rakela
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 5.  Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Thierry De Baere; Jean-Marc Idée; Sébastien Ballet
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus recommendations of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting.

Authors:  Melanie B Thomas; Deborah Jaffe; Michael M Choti; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Curley; Yuman Fong; Gregory Gores; Robert Kerlan; Phillipe Merle; Bert O'Neil; Ronnie Poon; Lawrence Schwartz; Joel Tepper; Francis Yao; Daniel Haller; Margaret Mooney; Alan Venook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Embolization of liver tumors: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Ashwin Rammohan; Jeswanth Sathyanesan; Sukumar Ramaswami; Anand Lakshmanan; Perumal Senthil-Kumar; Ulagendra Perumal Srinivasan; Ravi Ramasamy; Palaniappan Ravichandran
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-09-28

Review 8.  Transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Tsochatzis; Evangelia Fatourou; James O'Beirne; Tim Meyer; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Calibrated Bioresorbable Microspheres as an Embolic Agent: An Experimental Study in a Rabbit Renal Model.

Authors:  Lihui Weng; Davis Seelig; Parinaz Rostamzadeh; Jafar Golzarian
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  The effect of using different embolic agents on survival in transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: gelfoam versus polyvinyl alcohol.

Authors:  Ali Koçyiğit; Oğuz Dicle; Yiğit Göktay; Ibrahim Astarcıoğlu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.