Literature DB >> 16371142

Misperceptions in intergroup conflict. Disagreeing about what we disagree about.

John R Chambers1, Robert S Baron, Mary L Inman.   

Abstract

Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver's own ideology than for values that were central to the ideology of the perceiver's adversaries. To the extent that partisans assumed disagreement concerning personally important values, they were also inaccurate in perceiving their adversaries' actual opinions. Discussion focuses on the cognitive mechanisms underlying misperceptions of disagreement and strategies for reducing intergroup conflict.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16371142     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  5 in total

1.  Correcting misperceptions of gun policy support can foster intergroup cooperation between gun owners and non-gun owners.

Authors:  Mark W Susmann; Graham N Dixon; Brad J Bushman; R Kelly Garrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Age-related differences in function and structure of rSMG and reduced functional connectivity with DLPFC explains heightened emotional egocentricity bias in childhood.

Authors:  Nikolaus Steinbeis; Boris C Bernhardt; Tania Singer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Seeing beyond political affiliations: The mediating role of perceived moral foundations on the partisan similarity-liking effect.

Authors:  Kathryn Bruchmann; Birgit Koopmann-Holm; Aaron Scherer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Alteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Caroline Chawke; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.