Literature DB >> 16371071

Perceptions of health and well-being among women in a work-based welfare program.

Eugenie Hildebrandt1, Sheryl T Kelber.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Women who are single parents, poor, and employed in low-paying jobs have little choice about being dependent on public assistance programs to meet basic personal and family needs.
OBJECTIVE: To explore women's perceptions of their health and well-being while enrolled in a work-based welfare program. This is the second in a series of articles about Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Qualitative interviews and quantitative survey methods were used to explore perceptions of health and well-being in a purposive sample of mothers (n = 34) enrolled in a work-based welfare program in a city in the U.S. Midwest.
METHODS: Instruments used were a semistructured interview guide, a demographic data form, and the General Well-Being Schedule (i.e., a survey tool developed for the U.S. Health and Nutrition Examination Survey). Data collection was completed in June 2000. The data were triangulated; using both quantitative and qualitative data added to the in-depth understanding of the subjects.
RESULTS: Distress levels reported by participants were significantly higher than in the general U.S. population.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that current policies do not effectively support health and well-being of single mothers enrolled in work-based welfare programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16371071     DOI: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  2 in total

1.  Impoverished women with children and no welfare benefits: the urgency of researching failures of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.

Authors:  Eugenie Hildebrandt; Patricia Stevens
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Lone parents, health, wellbeing and welfare to work: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mhairi Campbell; Hilary Thomson; Candida Fenton; Marcia Gibson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.