Literature DB >> 16370958

Comparative cardiovascular safety of traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Marc Maillard1, Michel Burnier.   

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for their anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. Unfortunately, these drugs are not without toxicity, namely on the gastric mucosa, but also on the cardiovascular system. In this context, the marketing of the coxibs, a new series of NSAIDs that selectively inhibit COX-2, resulted in a large debate around their cardiovascular safety, because they may increase the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke. The recent suspension of a large, randomised, controlled trial comparing celecoxib, naproxen and placebo in Alzheimer patients (the ADAPT trial) because of an apparent elevated cardiovascular risk in the naproxen group revived the debate on the cardiovascular safety of these drugs, but this time with special emphasis on the effect of traditional nonselective NSAIDs (tNSAIDs). In this paper that reviews and discusses the cardiovascular safety profile of tNSAIDs, essentially naproxen and ibuprofen in view of the most recent experimental and clinical data, the authors note that the published data are quite discordant and one cannot conclude that there is clear evidence to support a cardiovascular hazard from the administration of naproxen or non-naproxen NSAIDs unless additional information is provided. In addition, the results of retrospective case-control studies have to be interpreted very carefully because of the risk of confounding factors that are not always taken into account when subjects were classified either as cases or controls. Thus, in the absence of clear cut data, physicians will have to use traditional NSAIDs (or coxibs) in patients with a high cardiovascular risk on the basis of their common sense rather than on evidence-based medicine. For these patients, one should not forget that an inadequate long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors such as a hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, smoking and weight excess is more deleterious in terms of cardiovascular mortality than the administration of NSAIDs itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16370958     DOI: 10.1517/14740338.5.1.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  6 in total

Review 1.  4 years after withdrawal of rofecoxib: where do we stand today?

Authors:  W Jaksch; C Dejaco; M Schirmer
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Cyrus Cooper; Jean-Yves Reginster; Marc Hochberg; Jaime Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Roland Chapurlat; Nasser Al-Daghri; Elaine Dennison; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Jean-François Kaux; Emmanuel Maheu; René Rizzoli; Roland Roth; Lucio C Rovati; Daniel Uebelhart; Mila Vlaskovska; André Scheen
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  Celecoxib: a review of its use in the management of arthritis and acute pain.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The effects of lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily vs. ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily on the blood pressure profiles of hypertensive osteoarthritis patients taking different classes of antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  T M MacDonald; D Richard; K Lheritier; G Krammer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Are NSAIDs useful to treat Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment?

Authors:  Bruno P Imbimbo; Vincenzo Solfrizzi; Francesco Panza
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  A comparison of the blood pressure changes of lumiracoxib with those of ibuprofen and naproxen.

Authors:  Michael E Farkouh; Freek W A Verheugt; Sean Ruland; Howard Kirshner; Raban Jeger; Xavier Gitton; Gerhard Krammer; Kirstin Stricker; Peter Sallstig; Bernhard Mellein; Patrice Matchaba; James H Chesebro
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.