Literature DB >> 16370942

Noninvasive delivery technologies: respiratory delivery of vaccines.

Vincent J Sullivan1, John A Mikszta, Philippe Laurent, Juan Huang, Brandi Ford.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the developments in noninvasive methods of drug delivery, with a focus on the delivery of vaccines via the respiratory tract. Recent results indicate that the respiratory system, and the nasal mucosa in particular, provide a valuable target site for immunisation against respiratory and mucosal pathogens. Vaccine delivery via the nasal and pulmonary routes each present distinct sets of performance requirements. Current delivery systems in development for both routes are reviewed herein. The storage and respiratory delivery of drugs and vaccines in powder form has been shown to provide improved stability and extended retention time in the respiratory mucosa. These features, in addition to the noninvasive nature of respiratory delivery, can provide benefits to public health vaccination campaigns, facilitating mass vaccination without the high cost of maintaining cold-chain storage.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16370942     DOI: 10.1517/17425247.3.1.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1742-5247            Impact factor:   6.648


  10 in total

1.  Mucosally delivered peptides prime strong immunity in HLA-A2.1 transgenic rabbits.

Authors:  Jiafen Hu; Nancy Cladel; Karla Balogh; Neil Christensen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Successful respiratory immunization with dry powder live-attenuated measles virus vaccine in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Wen-Hsuan Lin; Diane E Griffin; Paul A Rota; Mark Papania; Stephen P Cape; David Bennett; Brian Quinn; Robert E Sievers; Charles Shermer; Kenneth Powell; Robert J Adams; Steven Godin; Scott Winston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Devices for dry powder drug delivery to the lung.

Authors:  Kai Berkenfeld; Alf Lamprecht; Jason T McConville
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Nanocarriers targeting dendritic cells for pulmonary vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Nitesh K Kunda; Satyanarayana Somavarapu; Stephen B Gordon; Gillian A Hutcheon; Imran Y Saleem
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  A single immunization with a dry powder anthrax vaccine protects rabbits against lethal aerosol challenge.

Authors:  S D Klas; C R Petrie; S J Warwood; M S Williams; C L Olds; J P Stenz; A M Cheff; M Hinchcliffe; C Richardson; S Wimer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Protective immunity in mice achieved with dry powder formulation and alternative delivery of plague F1-V vaccine.

Authors:  Joanne Huang; Ajit J D'Souza; Jason B Alarcon; John A Mikszta; Brandi M Ford; Matthew S Ferriter; Michelle Evans; Todd Stewart; Kei Amemiya; Robert G Ulrich; Vincent J Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-03-04

Review 7.  Development of stable influenza vaccine powder formulations: challenges and possibilities.

Authors:  J-P Amorij; A Huckriede; J Wilschut; H W Frijlink; W L J Hinrichs
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  The bacterial second messenger cdiGMP exhibits promising activity as a mucosal adjuvant.

Authors:  Thomas Ebensen; Kai Schulze; Peggy Riese; Michael Morr; Carlos A Guzmán
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-06-13

9.  Cellular immune responses to nine Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine candidates following intranasal vaccination.

Authors:  Suraj B Sable; Mani Cheruvu; Subhadra Nandakumar; Sunita Sharma; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Kathryn L Kellar; James E Posey; Bonnie B Plikaytis; Rama Rao Amara; Thomas M Shinnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of immune responses to intranasal and intrapulmonary vaccinations with the attenuated Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae 168 strain in pigs.

Authors:  Pengcheng Li; Yunfeng Li; Guoqing Shao; Qinghua Yu; Qian Yang
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.267

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.