Literature DB >> 16370260

Motion sickness symptoms in a ship motion simulator: effects of inside, outside, and no view.

Jelte E Bos1, Scott N MacKinnon, Anthony Patterson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vehicle motion characteristics differ between air, road, and sea environments, both vestibularly and visually. Effects of vision on motion sickness have been studied before, though less systematically in a naval setting. It is hypothesized that appropriate visual information on self-motion is beneficial in a naval setting and that task performance is likely reduced as sickness increases.
METHODS: Using a within-subjects design, 24 subjects were exposed to 30 min of motion in a ship's bridge motion simulator with 3 visual conditions: an Earth-fixed outside view; an inside view that moved with the subjects; and a blindfolded condition. Subjective sickness symptoms and severity were rated repeatedly before, during, and after motion exposure. During the motion, subjects performed a mental task.
RESULTS: Though not excessive, sickness was highest in the inside viewing condition, intermediate in the outside viewing condition, and least in the blindfolded condition. The blindfolded condition was equally as bad as the inside viewing condition during the first 5-10 min of motion exposure. The overall temporal increase of sickness during motion was about equal to the decrease during recovery. No effect of sickness on task performance was observed. DISCUSSION: Most sickness in a naval setting is observed when the visual environment moves with the subjects, as has been reported in other environments, such as cars. Only mild sickness, caused by moderate motions, was provoked in this study and was alleviated by the performance task. A non-linear brain mechanism integrating visual and vestibular information may explain why the least sickness was observed when subjects were blindfolded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16370260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  24 in total

1.  Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues: effects of field of view, image size, depth cues, and degree of freedom.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; J E Bos; M M van Paassen; M Mulder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; John F Golding; Behrang Keshavarz; Joseph Furman; Ji-Soo Kim; Jose A Lopez-Escamez; Måns Magnusson; Bill J Yates; Ben D Lawson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  Relationship between Spectral Characteristics of Spontaneous Postural Sway and Motion Sickness Susceptibility.

Authors:  Rafael Laboissière; Jean-Charles Letievant; Eugen Ionescu; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Michel Mazzuca; Corinne Cian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Use of cues in virtual reality depends on visual feedback.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Fulvio; Bas Rokers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Intrinsic functional connectivity reduces after first-time exposure to short-term gravitational alterations induced by parabolic flight.

Authors:  Angelique Van Ombergen; Floris L Wuyts; Ben Jeurissen; Jan Sijbers; Floris Vanhevel; Steven Jillings; Paul M Parizel; Stefan Sunaert; Paul H Van de Heyning; Vincent Dousset; Steven Laureys; Athena Demertzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Could sound be used as a strategy for reducing symptoms of perceived motion sickness?

Authors:  Joakim Dahlman; Anna Sjörs; Torbjörn Ledin; Torbjörn Falkmer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Effect of Optokinetic Stimulation on Perceptual and Postural Symptoms in Visual Vestibular Mismatch Patients.

Authors:  Angelique Van Ombergen; Astrid J Lubeck; Vincent Van Rompaey; Leen K Maes; John F Stins; Paul H Van de Heyning; Floris L Wuyts; Jelte E Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Framing visual roll-motion affects postural sway and the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Astrid J A Lubeck; Jelte E Bos; John F Stins
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness.

Authors:  Natalia Dużmańska; Paweł Strojny; Agnieszka Strojny
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.