Literature DB >> 16369725

Reduction of sampling bias of odds ratios for vertebral fractures using propensity scores.

Y Lu1, H Jin, M-H Chen, C C Glüer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of the predictive power of a newly introduced diagnostic technique with regard to fracture risk is frequently limited by the enormous costs and long time periods required for prospective studies. A preliminary estimate of predictive power usually relies on cross-sectional case-control studies in which bone measurements of normal and fractured subjects are compared. The measured discriminatory power is taken as an estimate of predictive power. Because of possible sample selection bias, study participants may have different bone mineral density (BMD) values, and fractured patients may have fractures of different severity levels. The same diagnostic techniques for the measured discriminatory power, expressed as odds ratios, will differ among studies with different patient and control populations.
METHODS: In this paper, we propose a weighted logistic regression approach to adjust the odds ratio in order to reduce the effect of sampling bias. The weight is derived from age, deformity severity, BMD, and the interactions of these, using the propensity score theory and reference population data.
RESULTS: Simulation examples using data from the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS) demonstrate that such a procedure can effectively reduce the estimation bias of odds ratios introduced by sampling differences, such as for dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the spine and hip as well as various quantitative ultrasound techniques. The derived estimated odds ratios are substantially less biased, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals contain the true odds ratios from the population data.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a statistical correction procedure based on propensity scores and weighted logistic regression can effectively reduce the effect of sampling bias on the odds ratios calculated from cross-sectional case-control studies. For a new diagnostic technique, hip BMD and deformity severity information are necessary and likely sufficient to derive the propensity scores required to adjust the measured standardized odds ratios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16369725     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0021-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

1.  Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.

Authors:  Sherry Weitzen; Kate L Lapane; Alicia Y Toledano; Anne L Hume; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  An application of propensity score matching using claims data.

Authors:  John D Seeger; Paige L Williams; Alexander M Walker
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Risk assessment and fracture discrimination by ultrasound: the debate continues.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Nguyen D Nguyen; Henrik G Ahlborg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; L Christensen; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification.

Authors:  Beth A Bartholomew; Kishore J Harjai; Srinivas Dukkipati; Judith A Boura; Michael W Yerkey; Susan Glazier; Cindy L Grines; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study.

Authors:  Claus C Glüer; Richard Eastell; David M Reid; Dieter Felsenberg; Christian Roux; Reinhard Barkmann; Wolfram Timm; Tilo Blenk; Gabi Armbrecht; Alison Stewart; Jackie Clowes; Friederike E Thomasius; Sami Kolta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inverse propensity weighting to adjust for bias in fatal crash samples.

Authors:  David E Clark; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2012-10-22

2.  Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: data from LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA L).

Authors:  Graciela S Alarcón; Gerald McGwin; Ana M Bertoli; Barri J Fessler; Jaime Calvo-Alén; Holly M Bastian; Luis M Vilá; John D Reveille
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 19.103

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.