Literature DB >> 16369439

How do clinicians manage vaginal complaints? An Internet survey.

Matthew R Anderson1, Alison Karasz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although vaginal symptoms are among the most common presentations in primary care, little is known about how clinicians manage them. QUESTION: We undertook an Internet survey to determine how clinicians decided what was normal, how they evaluated vaginal complaints, and what happened when a diagnosis could not be reached.
METHODS: A 27-question anonymous survey was conducted using the Medscape Internet publication platform and Medscape General Medicine , an online, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal. The study was targeted at physicians and nurse practitioners.
RESULTS: There were 556 nurse practitioner and 608 physician respondents. Clinicians generally agreed that a midcycle increase in discharge and discharge seen at the introitus were normal; itching/irritation, odor, and a green discharge were not. There was less agreement concerning the value of a yellow discharge and "self-diagnosis" of abnormality. Eighty-two percent of MDs and 77% of NPs reported examining patients prior to treatment always or often. Only about 30% performed pH testing always or often. Ninety percent of NPs and 92% of MDs reported not making a diagnosis rarely or sometimes. When offered 4 different management strategies for patients in whom no diagnosis was made (watch and wait, symptomatic therapy, empiric antibiotics, referral), there was no clear preference. There was a weak correlation between performance of a wet mount and reports of less non-diagnosis. There was no correlation between pH and whiff testing and reports of less non-diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians do not always agree about what constitutes a vaginal symptom. Although most providers usually examine patients with vaginal complaints, pH and whiff testing are performed less frequently. Our data suggest the latter 2 maneuvers are not diagnostically helpful. There is no consensus regarding what to do when no diagnosis is made. Our findings suggest that the traditional approach to the evaluation of vaginal symptoms may have limited relevance for clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16369439      PMCID: PMC1681596     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MedGenMed        ISSN: 1531-0132


  11 in total

Review 1.  Infectious vaginitis. An accurate diagnosis is essential and attainable.

Authors:  A S Coco; M Vandenbosche
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  The vaginitis monologues: women's experiences of vaginal complaints in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Alison Karasz; Matthew Anderson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Vaginitis: finding the cause prevents treatment failure.

Authors:  A Cleveland
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  The limited value of symptoms and signs in the diagnosis of vaginal infections.

Authors:  V M Schaaf; E J Perez-Stable; K Borchardt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-09

Review 5.  Are vaginal symptoms ever normal? a review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew Anderson; Alison Karasz; Sarah Friedland
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-11-22

6.  The infrequent use of office-based diagnostic tests for vaginitis.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; I Macio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Validation of a WHO algorithm with risk assessment for the clinical management of vaginal discharge in Mwanza, Tanzania.

Authors:  P Mayaud; G ka-Gina; J Cornelissen; J Todd; G Kaatano; B West; E Uledi; M Rwakatare; L Kopwe; D Manoko; M Laga; H Grosskurth; R Hayes; D Mabey
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice. Comparison of clinical examination and comprehensive microbiology.

Authors:  A O Berg; F E Heidrich; S D Fihn; J J Bergman; R W Wood; W E Stamm; K K Holmes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Evaluation of vaginal complaints.

Authors:  Matthew R Anderson; Kathleen Klink; Andreas Cohrssen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The classic approach to diagnosis of vulvovaginitis: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J Bornstein; Y Lakovsky; I Lavi; A Bar-Am; H Abramovici
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Aptima Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification assay and BD affirm VPIII for detection of T. vaginalis in symptomatic women: performance parameters and epidemiological implications.

Authors:  Sarah B Andrea; Kimberle C Chapin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Accuracy of vaginal symptom self-diagnosis algorithms for deployed military women.

Authors:  Nancy A Ryan-Wenger; Jeremy L Neal; Ashley S Jones; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vaginitis compared with a DNA probe laboratory standard.

Authors:  Nancy K Lowe; Jeremy L Neal; Nancy A Ryan-Wenger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Women's Management of Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis and Experiences of Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jade Bilardi; Sandra Walker; Ruth McNair; Julie Mooney-Somers; Meredith Temple-Smith; Clare Bellhouse; Christopher Fairley; Marcus Chen; Catriona Bradshaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Codetection of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans by PCR in urine samples in a low-risk population attended in a clinic first level in central Veracruz, Mexico.

Authors:  A López-Monteon; F S Gómez-Figueroa; G Ramos-Poceros; D Guzmán-Gómez; A Ramos-Ligonio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.