Literature DB >> 16369316

Standardization vs diversity: how can we push peer review research forward?

Karen Shashok1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16369316      PMCID： PMC1681382     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MedGenMed        ISSN： 1531-0132


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  D G Altman; K F Schulz; D Moher; M Egger; F Davidoff; D Elbourne; P C Gøtzsche; T Lang
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The real dirty secret of academic publishing.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetlov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Choosing the best research design for each question.

Authors:  D L Sackett; J E Wennberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997 Dec 20-27

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?

Authors:  Karen Shashok
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ketevan Glonti; Darko Hren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.