Literature DB >> 16368839

Stimulating popliteal catheters for postoperative analgesia after hallux valgus repair.

Jaime Rodríguez1, Manuel Taboada, Javier Carceller, Juan Lagunilla, Maria Bárcena, Julián Alvarez.   

Abstract

Stimulating catheters have been recently introduced in clinical practice. We assessed the efficacy of stimulating and nonstimulating catheter placement for pain control and local anesthetic requirements after hallux valgus repair with continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block in this comparative, randomized, blinded-to-observer study of 48 patients. A stimulating catheter was placed in groups S-125 and S-0625. The same catheter was inserted without stimulation in group NS-125. An infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine was given in groups S-125 and NS-125, whereas 0.0625% levobupivacaine was used in group S-0625. All patients received an infusion of the test drug at a basal rate of 3 mL/h, with the possibility of an additional bolus of 3 mL every hour. Verbal analog scale (VAS) scores for pain were assessed between 6-8 h and between 19-23 h postoperatively. Multiple attempts were required for catheter insertion in all patients in groups S-125 and S-0625. Lower median (range) VAS scores for pain (0-100 points) were found in group S-125 at 6-8 h postoperatively when compared with groups S-0625 and NS-125: 5 (0-17.5) versus 60 (15-80) and 70 (25-80), respectively (P < 0.05); and lower VAS scores for pain were also found in group S-125 at 19-23 h when compared with group NS-125: 0 (0-0) and 7.5 (0-10), respectively (P < 0.05). Fewer patients required IV opioid analgesia in group S-125 than in groups S-0625 and NS-125: 0, 5, and 7 patients, respectively (P < 0.05). We conclude that efficacy in pain control was increased with stimulating catheter placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16368839     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189219.00096.0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Electrical nerve stimulation for plexus and nerve blocks].

Authors:  J Birnbaum; E Klotz; G Bogusch; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous interscalene nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study.

Authors:  Linda T Le; Vanessa J Loland; Edward R Mariano; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Continuous femoral nerve blocks: the impact of catheter tip location relative to the femoral nerve (anterior versus posterior) on quadriceps weakness and cutaneous sensory block.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Preetham J Suresh; Michael J Bishop; Michael C Donohue; Eliza J Ferguson; Sarah J Madison
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Edward R Mariano; Sarah J Madison; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Preetham J Suresh; Michael L Bishop; T Edward Kim; Michael C Donohue; Anna A Kulidjian; Scott T Ball
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Edward R Mariano; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Michael L Bishop; Daniel K Lee; Alexandra K Schwartz; Paul J Girard; Eliza J Ferguson; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  The effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks: a multicenter, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Linda T Le; Joanne Ramjohn; Vanessa J Loland; Anupama N Wadhwa; J C Gerancher; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Vanessa J Loland; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.108

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.