Literature DB >> 16368704

The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges.

Simon de Lusignan1, Chris van Weel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Routinely collected primary care data has underpinned research that has helped define primary care as a specialty. In the early years of the discipline, data were collected manually, but digital data collection now makes large volumes of data readily available. Primary care informatics is emerging as an academic discipline for the scientific study of how to harness these data. This paper reviews how data are stored in primary care computer systems; current use of large primary care research databases; and, the opportunities and challenges for using routinely collected primary care data in research. OPPORTUNITIES: (1) Growing volumes of routinely recorded data. (2) Improving data quality. (3) Technological progress enabling large datasets to be processed. (4) The potential to link clinical data in family practice with other data including genetic databases. (5) An established body of know-how within the international health informatics community. CHALLENGES: (1) Research methods for working with large primary care datasets are limited. (2) How to infer meaning from data. (3) Pace of change in medicine and technology. (4) Integrating systems where there is often no reliable unique identifier and between health (person-based records) and social care (care-based records-e.g. child protection). (5) Achieving appropriate levels of information security, confidentiality, and privacy.
CONCLUSION: Routinely collected primary care computer data, aggregated into large databases, is used for audit, quality improvement, health service planning, epidemiological study and research. However, gaps exist in the literature about how to find relevant data, select appropriate research methods and ensure that the correct inferences are drawn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368704     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  108 in total

1.  Data quality and fitness for purpose of routinely collected data--a general practice case study from an electronic practice-based research network (ePBRN).

Authors:  Siaw-Teng Liaw; Jane Taggart; Sarah Dennis; Anthony Yeo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  An evaluation of the UMLS in representing corpus derived clinical concepts.

Authors:  Jeff Friedlin; Marc Overhage
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 3.  Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems.

Authors:  Jatin Shah; Dimple Rajgor; Shreyasee Pradhan; Mariana McCready; Amrapali Zaveri; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an automated screening algorithm in an inpatient clinical trial.

Authors:  Catherine C Beauharnais; Mary E Larkin; Adrian H Zai; Emily C Boykin; Jennifer Luttrell; Deborah J Wexler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  REDLetr: Workflow and tools to support the migration of legacy clinical data capture systems to REDCap.

Authors:  William D Dunn; Jake Cobb; Allan I Levey; David A Gutman
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Access to chronic disease care in general practice: the acceptability of implementing systematic waiting-room screening using computer-based patient-reported risk status.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Mariko Carey; Sze Lin Yoong; Catherine D'Este; Meredith Makeham; Frans Henskens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Implementing Single Source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Rebecca Kush; Liora Alschuler; Roberto Ruggeri; Sally Cassells; Nitin Gupta; Landen Bain; Karen Claise; Monica Shah; Meredith Nahm
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Identification of misspelled words without a comprehensive dictionary using prevalence analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Turchin; Julia T Chu; Maria Shubina; Jonathan S Einbinder
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 9.  Electronic medical records (EMRs), epidemiology, and epistemology: reflections on EMRs and future pediatric clinical research.

Authors:  Richard C Wasserman
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Comparison of the cohort selection performance of Australian Medicines Terminology to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical mappings.

Authors:  Guan N Guo; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Sanjay Farshid; Vojtech Huser; Christian Reich; Siaw-Teng Liaw
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.