Literature DB >> 16368634

Pedometer reliability, validity and daily activity targets among 10- to 15-year-old boys.

Russell Jago1, Kathleen Watson, Tom Baranowski, Issa Zakeri, Sunmi Yoo, Janice Baranowski, Kelly Conry.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to: (1) determine whether the number of pedometer counts recorded by adolescents differs according to the adiposity of the participant or location on the body; (2) assess the accuracy and reliability of pedometers during field activity; and (3) set adolescent pedometer-based physical activity targets. Seventy-eight 11- to 15-year-old Boy Scouts completed three types of activity: walking, fast walking and running. Each type was performed twice. Participants wore three pedometers and one activity monitor during all activities. Participants were divided into groups of normal weight (BMI < 85th percentile) and at risk of being overweight (BMI > or = 85th percentile). Intra-class correlations across the three activities indicated reliability (r = 0.51 - 0.92, P < 0.001). This conclusion was supported by narrow limits of agreement that were within a pre-set range that was practically meaningful. Multivariate analysis of covariance indicated adiposity group differences, but this difference was a function of the increased stature among the larger participants (P < 0.001). Ordinary least-squares regression models and multi-level regression models showed positive associations between the number of pedometer and activity monitor counts recorded by the three groups of participants during all activities (all P < 0.001). The mean number of counts recorded for all participants during the fast walk was 127 counts per minute. In conclusion, the pedometers provided an accurate assessment of adolescent physical activity, and a conservative estimate of 8000 pedometer counts in 60 min is equivalent to 60 min of moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16368634     DOI: 10.1080/02640410500141661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  13 in total

1.  Obesogenic diet and physical activity: independent or associated behaviours in adolescents?

Authors:  R Jago; A R Ness; P Emmett; C Mattocks; L Jones; C J Riddoch
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  A comparison of two motion sensors for the assessment of free-living physical activity of adolescents.

Authors:  Roman Cuberek; Walid El Ansari; Karel Frömel; Krzysztof Skalik; Erik Sigmund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Step counts and body mass index among 9-14 years old greek schoolchildren.

Authors:  Maria Michalopoulou; Vassilios Gourgoulis; Thomas Kourtessis; Antonios Kambas; Martina Dimitrou; Helen Gretziou
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Walking activity patterns in youth with cerebral palsy and youth developing typically.

Authors:  Kristie F Bjornson; Chuan Zhou; Richard Stevenson; Dimitri Christakis; Kit Song
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 5.  How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Michael W Beets; Sarahjane Belton; Greet M Cardon; Scott Duncan; Yoshiro Hatano; David R Lubans; Timothy S Olds; Anders Raustorp; David A Rowe; John C Spence; Shigeho Tanaka; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Does School-Based Health Promotion Affect Physical Activity on Weekends? And, Does It Reach Those Students Most in Need of Health Promotion?

Authors:  Kerry A Bastian; Katerina Maximova; Jonathan McGavock; Paul Veugelers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sources and magnitude of variability in pedometer-determined physical activity levels of youth.

Authors:  So-Yeun Kim; Hye-Sang Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  Pedometers and aerobic capacity: evaluating an elementary after-school running program.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wanless; Lawrence W Judge; Shannon T Dieringer; David Bellar; James Johnson; Sheli Plummer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-02

9.  Validity of SC-StepRx pedometer-derived moderate and vigorous physical activity during treadmill walking and running in a heterogeneous sample of children and youth.

Authors:  Travis John Saunders; Casey Ellen Gray; Michael Marc Borghese; Allison McFarlane; Afekwo Mbonu; Zachary Michael Ferraro; Mark Stephen Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The importance of parental beliefs and support for pedometer-measured physical activity on school days and weekend days among Canadian children.

Authors:  Kerry A Vander Ploeg; Stefan Kuhle; Katerina Maximova; Jonathan McGavock; Biao Wu; Paul J Veugelers
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.