Literature DB >> 16368617

Benefits of an external focus of attention: common coding or conscious processing?

J M Poolton1, J P Maxwell, R S W Masters, M Raab.   

Abstract

We conducted two experiments to assess the effect attentional focus has on learning a complex motor skill and subsequent performance under secondary task loading. Participants in Experiment 1 learnt a golf putting task (300 practice trials) with a single instruction to either focus on their hands (internal focus) or the movement of the putter (external focus). No group differences were evident during learning or retention. Differences between the groups were only apparent under secondary task load; the external group's performance remained robust, while the internal group suffered a drop in performance. Verbal protocols demonstrated that the internal group accumulated significantly more internal knowledge and more task-relevant knowledge in general than the external group. Experiment 2 was designed to establish whether greater internal focus knowledge or greater explicit rule build up in general was responsible for performance breakdown. Two groups were presented with a set of six internal or external rules. Again, no performance differences were found during learning or retention. During the secondary task, both groups experienced performance deterioration. It was concluded that accumulation of explicit rules to guide performance was responsible for the internal group's breakdown in performance under secondary task loading and may be responsible for some of the performance differences reported previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16368617     DOI: 10.1080/02640410500130854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  14 in total

1.  Influence of varying focus of attention conditions on dart throwing performance in experts and novices.

Authors:  J Schorer; T Jaitner; R Wollny; F Fath; J Baker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of different attentional instructions on the acquisition of a serial movement task.

Authors:  Mei Teng Woo; Jia Yi Chow; Michael Koh
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke.

Authors:  E C Kal; J van der Kamp; H Houdijk; E Groet; C A M van Bennekom; E J A Scherder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Is Implicit Motor Learning Preserved after Stroke? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  E Kal; M Winters; J van der Kamp; H Houdijk; E Groet; C van Bennekom; E Scherder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions.

Authors:  Tim Buszard; Damian Farrow; Simone J J M Verswijveren; Machar Reid; Jacqueline Williams; Remco Polman; Fiona Chun Man Ling; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-22

7.  The Inter-Regional Connectivity Within the Default Mode Network During the Attentional Processes of Internal Focus and External Focus: An fMRI Study of Continuous Finger Force Feedback.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Zhou; Xia-Qing Lan; Yan-Tong Fang; Yun Gong; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong Luo; Hang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-26

8.  Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Louise Johnson; Jane Burridge; Sara Demain; Sean Ewings
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-11-05

9.  The Movement Kinematics and Learning Strategies Associated with Adopting Different Foci of Attention during Both Acquisition and Anxious Performance.

Authors:  Gavin P Lawrence; Victoria M Gottwald; Michael A Khan; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02

10.  Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review.

Authors:  Elmar Kal; Rens Prosée; Marinus Winters; John van der Kamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.