Literature DB >> 1636833

Imported leprosy in the United States, 1978 through 1988: an epidemic without secondary transmission.

T D Mastro1, S C Redd, R F Breiman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Leprosy remains a major health problem in many regions of the world. In the United States, although leprosy continues to be reported, approximately 90% of cases are imported (i.e., occur among immigrants and refugees). An increase in imported cases began in 1978. This study was conducted to analyze this trend and to characterize the contributing cases.
METHODS: Centers for Disease Control leprosy surveillance data from 1971 through 1988 were analyzed.
RESULTS: The number of imported cases reported annually was relatively constant from 1971 through 1977 (mean = 119 per year), increased to 307 in 1985, and then decreased to 102 in 1988. Of the 957 excess cases reported from 1978 through 1988, 73.4% were among persons from Southeast Asia, including 51.3% from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos (Indochina). There was no coincident increase in indigenous cases of leprosy; the mean annual number of such cases was 17.7 (range = 10 to 29). Leprosy remains endemic in Texas, Hawaii, Louisiana, and possibly California.
CONCLUSIONS: An epidemic of imported leprosy began in the United States in 1978, peaked in 1985, and ended by 1988. This increase was primarily due to cases among refugees from Indochina and was limited by a decrease in the influx of Indochinese refugees in the mid-1980s. There is no evidence that these cases resulted in transmission in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1636833      PMCID: PMC1695739          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.8.1127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  Possible transmission of Mycobacterium leprae in a group of UK leprosy contacts.

Authors:  H M Dockrell; H Eastcott; S Young; A MacFarlane; R Hussain; M F Waters
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Leprosy control through multidrug therapy (MDT).

Authors:  S K Noordeen
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Leprosy in the United States, 1971-1973.

Authors:  G S Golden; J B McCormick; D W Fraser
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  Leprosy: the epidemiology of a slow bacterium.

Authors:  P E Fine
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Leprosy in the United States, 1967-76.

Authors:  C D Enna; R R Jackson; J R Trautman; M Sturdivant
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Leprosy in the United States, 1971-1981.

Authors:  M A Neill; A W Hightower; C V Broome
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Management of household contacts of leprosy patients.

Authors:  G A Filice; D W Fraser
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Immigration and leprosy in Hawaii, 1960-1981.

Authors:  R M Worth; M R Bomgaars
Journal:  Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  1982-09
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Autochthonous Leprosy without Armadillo Exposure, Eastern United States.

Authors:  Tina Rendini; William Levis
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.883

2.  Trends of leprosy and multibacillary infection in the state of Georgia since the early 1900s.

Authors:  Carter D McCormick; Jacqueline Lea; Barbara M Stryjewska; Ashton Thompson; Jessica K Fairley
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-10-11

3.  Epidemiology of Leprosy in Spain: The Role of the International Migration.

Authors:  José M Ramos; David Romero; Isabel Belinchón
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-03-03

4.  Autochthonous leprosy in Spain: Has the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae stopped?

Authors:  Inés Suárez-García; Diana Gómez-Barroso; Paul E M Fine
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.