Literature DB >> 16368057

Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting.

William J Valentine1, Andrew J Palmer, Morten Lammert, Lars Nicklasson, Volker Foos, Stéphane Roze.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term clinical and cost outcomes associated with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30/70, premixed 30% soluble and 70% protaminated insulin aspart in one injection) compared to insulin glargine treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients failing oral antidiabetic agents in the UK, based on findings recently reported from the INITIATE clinical trial.
METHODS: The CORE Diabetes Model, a published, peer-reviewed and validated model of diabetes, was used to evaluate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, cumulative incidence of complications and direct medical costs over patient lifetimes. The model simulates the range of diabetic complications and disease progression within a series of sub-models (cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, renal and eye disease) based on published data. Baseline cohort characteristics (54.5% male, mean age 52.45 years, mean diabetes duration 9 years, mean HbA(1c) 9.77%) and treatment effects were based on INITIATE. Costs were derived from published UK sources. The analysis was run over a 35-year time horizon (patient lifetime) from a third party payer perspective. Costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were performed.
RESULTS: BIAsp 30/70 was associated with projected improvements in discounted life expectancy (0.19 +/- 0.20 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (0.19 +/- 0.14 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]), as well as a reduced incidence of retinopathy and nephropathy complications, versus glargine. Total lifetime direct costs were 1319 pounds higher with BIAsp 30/70 than with glargine leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 6951 pounds per QALY gained.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to address the long-term health economic implications of treating type 2 diabetes patients failing oral anti-diabetics with a biphasic insulin mix versus long-acting insulin. Our projections indicate that improved HbA1c levels with BIAsp 30/70 treatment are associated with improvements in life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, and that BIAsp 30/70 represents excellent value for money compared to insulin glargine in the UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368057     DOI: 10.1185/030079905X74989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  8 in total

Review 1.  Estimating drug costs in economic evaluations in Ireland and the UK: an analysis of practice and research recommendations.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes; Lesley Tilson; Michael Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Analogues in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Asrul Akmal Shafie; Chin Hui Ng; Yui Ping Tan; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Biphasic insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based medicine review.

Authors:  S C L Gough; J Tibaldi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Cost-effectiveness of diabetes case management for low-income populations.

Authors:  Todd P Gilmer; Stéphane Roze; William J Valentine; Katrina Emy-Albrecht; Joshua A Ray; David Cobden; Lars Nicklasson; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Ten years of experience with biphasic insulin aspart 30: from drug development to the latest clinical findings.

Authors:  Andreas Liebl; Vinay Prusty; Paul Valensi; Ryuzo Kawamori; Jens Sandahl Christiansen; Andrew J Palmer; Per Balschmidt; Robert Ligthelm; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  How Consistent is the Relationship between Improved Glucose Control and Modelled Health Outcomes for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xinyang Hua; Thomas Wai-Chun Lung; Andrew Palmer; Lei Si; William H Herman; Philip Clarke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Examining correlates of treatment satisfaction for injectable insulin in type 2 diabetes: lessons learned from a clinical trial comparing biphasic and basal analogues.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; David Cobden; Morten Lammert; Donald Bushnell; Philip Raskin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 8.  Review of biphasic insulin aspart in the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Nazia Raja-Khan; Sarah S Warehime; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.