Literature DB >> 16367945

O-glycosylated versus non-glycosylated MUC1-derived peptides as potential targets for cytotoxic immunotherapy of carcinoma.

D Stepensky1, E Tzehoval, E Vadai, L Eisenbach.   

Abstract

Due to the fact that many cellular proteins are extensively glycosylated, processing and presentation mechanisms are expected to produce a pool of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-bound protein-derived peptides, part of which retain sugar moieties. The immunogenic properties of the presented glycosylated peptides in comparison to their non-glycosylated counterparts have not been determined clearly. We assessed the cellular immunogenicity of MUC1 (mucin)-derived peptides O-glycosylated with a Tn epitope (GalNAc) using HLA-A*0201 single chain (HHD)-transfected cell lines and transgenic mice. For part of the compounds Tn moiety did not interfere with the HLA-A*0201 binding. Moreover, part of the glycopeptides elicited effective cytotoxic responses, indicating recognition of the glycopeptide-HLA-A*0201 complex by the T cell receptor (TCR) and subsequent cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation. The CTLs exhibited a substantial degree of cross-reactivity against target cells loaded with glycosylated and non-glycosylated forms of the same peptide. The studied (glyco)peptides showed cellular immunogenicity in both MUC1-HHD and HHD mice and induced effective lysis of (glyco)peptide-loaded target cells in CTL assays. However, the elicited CTLs did not induce selective lysis of human MUC1-expressing murine cell lines. Moreover, immunization with (glyco)peptide-loaded dendritic cells (DCs) did not induce significant immunotherapeutic effects. We conclude that Tn glycosylated MUC1-derived peptides can be presented by MHC class I molecules, and may be recognized by specific TCR molecules resulting in cytotoxic immune responses. However, the studied glycopeptides did not offer significant benefit as targets for cytotoxic immune response due apparently to (a) cross-reactivity of the elicited CTLs against the glycosylated and non-glycosylated forms of the same peptide and (b) low abundance of glycopeptides on tumour target cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16367945      PMCID: PMC1809564          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02965.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


  26 in total

1.  Differential expression of MUC1 on transfected cell lines influences its recognition by MUC1 specific T cells.

Authors:  J Magarian-Blander; R P Hughey; C Kinlough; P A Poland; O J Finn
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 2.  Immunoreactive T and Tn epitopes in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy.

Authors:  G F Springer
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  The polymorphic epithelial mucin: potential as an immunogen for a cancer vaccine.

Authors:  R A Graham; J M Burchell; J Taylor-Papadimitriou
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Induction of HLA-A2-restricted CTLs to the mucin 1 human breast cancer antigen.

Authors:  V Apostolopoulos; V Karanikas; J S Haurum; I F McKenzie
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Tolerance and immunity to MUC1 in a human MUC1 transgenic murine model.

Authors:  G J Rowse; R M Tempero; M L VanLith; M A Hollingsworth; S J Gendler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Tissue-specific expression of a human polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1) in transgenic mice.

Authors:  N Peat; S J Gendler; N Lalani; T Duhig; J Taylor-Papadimitriou
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Characterization and molecular cloning of a novel MUC1 protein, devoid of tandem repeats, expressed in human breast cancer tissue.

Authors:  S Zrihan-Licht; H L Vos; A Baruch; O Elroy-Stein; D Sagiv; I Keydar; J Hilkens; D H Wreschner
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1994-09-01

8.  The differential expression of H-2K versus H-2D antigens, distinguishing high-metastatic from low-metastatic clones, is correlated with the immunogenic properties of the tumor cells.

Authors:  L Eisenbach; N Hollander; L Greenfeld; H Yakor; S Segal; M Feldman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  HLA-A2.1-restricted education and cytolytic activity of CD8(+) T lymphocytes from beta2 microglobulin (beta2m) HLA-A2.1 monochain transgenic H-2Db beta2m double knockout mice.

Authors:  S Pascolo; N Bervas; J M Ure; A G Smith; F A Lemonnier; B Pérarnau
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1997-06-16       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Recognition of carbohydrate by major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted, glycopeptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  J S Haurum; G Arsequell; A C Lellouch; S Y Wong; R A Dwek; A J McMichael; T Elliott
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identification of O-glycosylated decapeptides within the MUC1 repeat domain as potential MHC class I (A2) binding epitopes.

Authors:  Tanja Ninkovic; Leo Kinarsky; Katja Engelmann; Vladimir Pisarev; Simon Sherman; Olivera J Finn; Franz-Georg Hanisch
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Antibody recognition of a unique tumor-specific glycopeptide antigen.

Authors:  Cory L Brooks; Andrea Schietinger; Svetlana N Borisova; Peter Kufer; Mark Okon; Tomoko Hirama; C Roger Mackenzie; Lai-Xi Wang; Hans Schreiber; Stephen V Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Lipopeptides: a novel antigen repertoire presented by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules.

Authors:  Daisuke Morita; Masahiko Sugita
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Cancer vaccines and carbohydrate epitopes.

Authors:  Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro; Michelle Lum; Geraldine Vijay; Miten Jain; Adel Almogren; Kate Rittenhouse-Olson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Tn glycosylation of the MUC6 protein modulates its immunogenicity and promotes the induction of Th17-biased T cell responses.

Authors:  Teresa Freire; Richard Lo-Man; Sylvie Bay; Claude Leclerc
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Mucin-type O-glycans in human colon and breast cancer: glycodynamics and functions.

Authors:  Inka Brockhausen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Immune recognition of tumor-associated mucin MUC1 is achieved by a fully synthetic aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 tripartite vaccine.

Authors:  Vani Lakshminarayanan; Pamela Thompson; Margreet A Wolfert; Therese Buskas; Judy M Bradley; Latha B Pathangey; Cathy S Madsen; Peter A Cohen; Sandra J Gendler; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Bridging innate and adaptive antitumor immunity targeting glycans.

Authors:  Anastas Pashov; Bejatolah Monzavi-Karbassi; Gajendra P S Raghava; Thomas Kieber-Emmons
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-15

9.  Adaptive immune activation: glycosylation does matter.

Authors:  Margreet A Wolfert; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Immune and anticancer responses elicited by fully synthetic aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 tripartite vaccines modified by a TLR2 or TLR9 agonist.

Authors:  Abu-Baker M Abdel-Aal; Vani Lakshminarayanan; Pamela Thompson; Nitin Supekar; Judy M Bradley; Margreet A Wolfert; Peter A Cohen; Sandra J Gendler; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.