Literature DB >> 16367440

The Ascription of Responsibility Questionnaire: development and empirical extensions.

A R Hakstian1, P Suedfeld, E J Ballard, D S Rank.   

Abstract

This article describes the development of the Ascription of Responsibility Questionnaire (ARQ). In Study 1, item analytic and factor analytic procedures were used, with a data set based on 251 subjects, to reduce an initial pool of 92 Likert Scale items to 41 items that were structured by four clear, independent ascription tendencies, or ways in which people ascribe responsibility. In Study 2, this factorial structure was confirmed on a sample of 403 subjects. From the responses in both studies, reliabilities of the four ascription of responsibility scales were assessed. On the basis of a pooled sample, norms were developed. Construct validity assessment was begun by correlating scores, in both studies, on the ascription of responsibility scales with a number of conceptually related standardized and semistandardized scales, as well as with a number of demographic and personological variables that might be related to attributional and attitudinal tendencies. These and further construct validation results obtained by comparative analytic methods are presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 16367440     DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5002_10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  1 in total

1.  Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Frederike Beyer; Nura Sidarus; Sofia Bonicalzi; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.