Literature DB >> 16366844

Evaluation of public health interventions for Anthrax: a report to the secretary's council on Public Health Preparedness.

Lawrence M Wein1, David L Craft.   

Abstract

To aid in understanding how best to respond to a bioterror anthrax attack, we analyze a system of differential equations that includes a disease progression model, a set of spatially distributed queues for distributing antibiotics, and vaccination (pre-event and/or post-event). We derive approximate expressions for the number of casualties as a function of key parameters and management levers, including the time at which the attack is detected, the number of days to distribute antibiotics, the adherence to prophylactic antibiotics, and the fraction of the population that is preimmunized. We compare a variety of public health intervention policies in the event of a hypothetical anthrax attack in a large metropolitan area. Modeling assumptions were decided by the Anthrax Modeling Working Group of the Secretary's Council on Public Health Preparedness. Our results highlight the primary importance of rapid antibiotic distribution and lead us to argue for ensuring post-attack surge capacity to rapidly produce enough anthrax vaccine for an additional 100 million people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366844     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of back-calculation techniques and their potential to inform mitigation strategies with application to non-transmissible acute infectious diseases.

Authors:  Joseph R Egan; Ian M Hall
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Modeling inhalational tularemia: deliberate release and public health response.

Authors:  Joseph R Egan; Ian M Hall; Steve Leach
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2011-11-01

3.  Operational evaluation of high-throughput community-based mass prophylaxis using Just-in-time training.

Authors:  James D Spitzer; Nathaniel Hupert; Jonathan Duckart; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Recommendations for modeling disaster responses in public health and medicine: a position paper of the society for medical decision making.

Authors:  Margaret L Brandeau; Jessica H McCoy; Nathaniel Hupert; Jon-Erik Holty; Dena M Bravata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Cost-effectiveness comparison of response strategies to a large-scale anthrax attack on the chicago metropolitan area: impact of timing and surge capacity.

Authors:  Demetrios N Kyriacou; Debra Dobrez; Jorge P Parada; Justin M Steinberg; Adam Kahn; Charles L Bennett; Brian P Schmitt
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2012-07-30

6.  Modeling Tool for Decision Support during Early Days of an Anthrax Event.

Authors:  Gabriel Rainisch; Martin I Meltzer; Sean Shadomy; William A Bower; Nathaniel Hupert
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.883

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.