Literature DB >> 16366071

Do university ethics committees adequately protect public health researchers?

Virginia Dickson-Swift1, Erica L James, Sandra Kippen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to examine whether university human research ethics committees (HRECs) proactively seek to protect members of the research team as well as study subjects in their written documentation.
METHODS: A content analysis of 37 Australian university HREC application forms and attachments was undertaken. Each form was allocated to one of four predetermined categories.
RESULTS: Of the 37 forms, only three included an explicit request for the applicant to reflect on all possible aspects of safety of the researchers (physical, psychological and emotional).
CONCLUSION: Few HRECs have taken issues of possible harm to researchers into account in their documentation. It is recommended that HRECs explicitly recognise potential risks to researchers, especially those engaged in exploration of sensitive topics, in their processes of approving human research. It is also recommended that researchers consider the possible implications of undertaking this type of research and ensure strategies are in place to minimise these risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366071     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00254.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  5 in total

1.  Community engagement and building trust to resolve ethical challenges during humanitarian crises: experience from the CAGED study.

Authors:  Getnet Yimer; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Arie Havelaar; Jemal Yousuf; Sarah McKune; Abdulmuen Mohammed; Dónal O'Mathúna
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.723

2.  Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: the necessity to develop a specific guideline.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sanjari; Fatemeh Bahramnezhad; Fatemeh Khoshnava Fomani; Mahnaz Shoghi; Mohammad Ali Cheraghi
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2014-08-04

3.  The emotional challenges of conducting in-depth research into significant health issues in health geography: reflections on emotional labour, fieldwork and life course.

Authors:  Sarah McGarrol
Journal:  Area (Oxf)       Date:  2017-05-09

4.  Animal researchers shoulder a psychological burden that animal ethics committees ought to address.

Authors:  Mike King; Hazem Zohny
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.926

5.  A systematic review on ethical challenges of 'field' research in low-income and middle-income countries: respect, justice and beneficence for research staff?

Authors:  Janina Isabel Steinert; David Atika Nyarige; Milan Jacobi; Jana Kuhnt; Lennart Kaplan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.