Literature DB >> 16365572

Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography.

Stacy D O'Connor1, Ronald M Summers, J Richard Choi, Perry J Pickhardt.   

Abstract

Although oral contrast agents are known to improve the accuracy of CT colonography (CTC) by tagging fluid and stool, it is not well recognized that oral contrast also adheres to the surface of polyps. The authors' objective was to quantitate the frequency of contrast adhering to polyps. Three hundred thirty-eight optical colonoscopy-proven polyps were identified on CTC of all of the 216 patients with polyps in a larger cohort of screening patients. CT scans of polyps were analyzed for adherent contrast (ie, a thin coat/adherent drops) in at least one view (prone/supine). Forty-six percent of the 312 polyps not touching a contrast pool had adherent contrast. Polyps with villous histology were significantly more likely to have adherent contrast (77% [20/26] vs. 43% [124/286], P<0.001). Oral contrast agents often tag polyp surfaces in a pattern that is distinct from internal tagging of adherent stool, which must be recognized during CTC interpretation. Polyps with villous histology show a higher rate of contrast adherence than nonvillous polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16365572     DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000191686.35968.f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  17 in total

Review 1.  Improving the accuracy of CTC interpretation: computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Carpet lesions detected at CT colonography: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Vu P Lam; Jennifer M Weiss; Gregory D Kennedy; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of translucency rendering to differentiate polyps from pseudopolyps at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A Guerrisi; D Marin; A Laghi; M Di Martino; F Iafrate; R Iannaccone; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2013-02

Review 7.  CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results.

Authors:  Igor Trilisky; Kristen Wroblewski; Michael W Vannier; John M Horne; Abraham H Dachman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Bryan Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 9.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.