OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) case ascertainment using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in a 2003 Report to Congress. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of all patients presenting to an urban academic emergency department (ED) over six months in 2003. A real-time clinical assessment of mild TBI was compared with the ICD-9 codes assigned after ED or hospital discharge for a determination of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Of the 35,096 patients presenting to the ED, 516 had clinically defined mild TBI and 1,000 were assigned one or more of the mild TBI ICD-9 codes proposed by the CDC. The sensitivity of these codes was 45.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 41.3% to 50.2%) with a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI = 97.6% to 97.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of mild TBI patients using retrospectively assigned ICD-9 codes appears to be inaccurate. These codes are associated with a significant number of false-positive and false-negative code assignments. Mild TBI incidence and prevalence estimates using these codes should be interpreted with caution. ICD-9 codes should not replace a clinical assessment for mild TBI when accurate case ascertainment is required.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) case ascertainment using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in a 2003 Report to Congress. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of all patients presenting to an urban academic emergency department (ED) over six months in 2003. A real-time clinical assessment of mild TBI was compared with the ICD-9 codes assigned after ED or hospital discharge for a determination of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Of the 35,096 patients presenting to the ED, 516 had clinically defined mild TBI and 1,000 were assigned one or more of the mild TBI ICD-9 codes proposed by the CDC. The sensitivity of these codes was 45.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 41.3% to 50.2%) with a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI = 97.6% to 97.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of mild TBI patients using retrospectively assigned ICD-9 codes appears to be inaccurate. These codes are associated with a significant number of false-positive and false-negative code assignments. Mild TBI incidence and prevalence estimates using these codes should be interpreted with caution. ICD-9 codes should not replace a clinical assessment for mild TBI when accurate case ascertainment is required.
Authors: Cynthia L Leibson; Allen W Brown; Jeanine E Ransom; Nancy N Diehl; Patricia K Perkins; Jay Mandrekar; James F Malec Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Jie Xu; Luke V Rasmussen; Pamela L Shaw; Guoqian Jiang; Richard C Kiefer; Huan Mo; Jennifer A Pacheco; Peter Speltz; Qian Zhu; Joshua C Denny; Jyotishman Pathak; William K Thompson; Enid Montague Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Andrea L C Schneider; Elizabeth Selvin; Menglu Liang; Lawrence Latour; L Christine Turtzo; Silvia Koton; Josef Coresh; Thomas Mosley; Christopher T Whitlow; Yun Zhou; Dean F Wong; Geoffrey Ling; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Brian W Patterson; Maureen A Smith; Michael D Repplinger; Michael S Pulia; James E Svenson; Michael K Kim; Manish N Shah Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amy Lee; Chester K Yarbrough; Jacob K Greenberg; Jason Barber; David D Limbrick; Matthew D Smyth Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Martin R Cota; Anita D Moses; Neekita R Jikaria; Katie C Bittner; Ramon R Diaz-Arrastia; Lawrence L Latour; L Christine Turtzo Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 5.269