Literature DB >> 16365020

Interest in testing for genetic susceptibility to lung cancer among Black college students "at risk" of becoming cigarette smokers.

Colleen M McBride1, Isaac M Lipkus, David Jolly, Pauline Lyna.   

Abstract

Receptivity to genetic testing for lung cancer susceptibility was assessed among African American college freshmen, who held attitudes favorable towards or had experimented with cigarette smoking. Students (n = 95) completed a telephone survey that assessed beliefs about genetics and lung cancer risk, interest in genetic testing, and expectations about the test outcome. Interest in being tested was moderately high (mean, 5; SD, 2.2; scale of 1-7) and highest among those who believed lung cancer was influenced by genetics (r = 0.22, P < 0.05) and those who expected to be at high risk (r = 0.27, P < 0.05). Overall, 34% thought if tested, the result would show high risk for lung cancer. In multivariate analyses, students' test result expectation was the only significant predictor of interest in testing. Those who believed the test would show them to be at higher risk were thrice more likely to be interested in testing than those who thought the test would show that they were at lower risk (odds ratio, 2.99; confidence interval, 1.03-8.64; P = 0.04). Future research is needed to understand how young adults will respond to genetic susceptibility feedback that confirms or contradicts their expectations about personal risks of smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16365020     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  6 in total

1.  A Genetic Lung Cancer Susceptibility Test may have a Positive Effect on Smoking Cessation.

Authors:  Tammy Kammin; Andrew K Fenton; Kathryn Thirlaway
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Young smokers' interpretations of the estimated lung cancer risk associated with a common genetic variant of low penetrance.

Authors:  S C Sanderson; C M McBride; S C O'Neill; S Docherty; J Shepperd; I M Lipkus
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Public health genomics and genetic test evaluation: the challenge of conducting behavioural research on the utility of lifestyle-genetic tests.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-08-06

4.  Cancer risk assessment using genetic panel testing: considerations for clinical application.

Authors:  Susan Hiraki; Erica S Rinella; Freya Schnabel; Ruth Oratz; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  African Americans' responses to genetic explanations of lung cancer disparities and their willingness to participate in clinical genetics research.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Laura M Koehly; Adedamola Omogbehin; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katie E J Hann; Madeleine Freeman; Lindsay Fraser; Jo Waller; Saskia C Sanderson; Belinda Rahman; Lucy Side; Sue Gessler; Anne Lanceley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.