Kirsten B Moysich1, Julie A Baker, Kerry J Rodabaugh, Jeannine A Villella. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, A-316 Carlton House, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263. kirsten.moysich@roswellpark.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Analgesic use has been implicated in the chemoprevention of a number of solid tumors, but thus far, no previous research has focused on the role of aspirin in endometrial cancer etiology. METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study of 427 women with primary, incident endometrial cancer, and 427 age- and residence-matched controls without benign or malignant neoplasms. All participants received medical services at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY, and completed a comprehensive epidemiologic questionnaire. Women who reported analgesic use at least once a week for at least 6 months were classified as regular users and served as the reference group throughout the analyses. We used unconditional logistic regression analyses to compute crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Compared with nonusers, regular aspirin users were not at reduced risk of endometrial cancer (adjusted OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.26), nor were women with the highest frequency, duration, or cumulative lifetime aspirin use. When the sample was divided by body mass index status, regular aspirin use was not associated with risk among women classified as normal weight or overweight, but a significant risk reduction was seen for obese women (adjusted OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.92). Significant decreases in risk were also observed for obese women with the greatest frequency, duration, and cumulative aspirin use. No significant associations in the overall sample or among obese women were noted for acetaminophen use. CONCLUSION: We observed no evidence of an overall chemoprotective effect of aspirin on endometrial cancer risk, but the significant risk reductions among obese women warrant further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Analgesic use has been implicated in the chemoprevention of a number of solid tumors, but thus far, no previous research has focused on the role of aspirin in endometrial cancer etiology. METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study of 427 women with primary, incident endometrial cancer, and 427 age- and residence-matched controls without benign or malignant neoplasms. All participants received medical services at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY, and completed a comprehensive epidemiologic questionnaire. Women who reported analgesic use at least once a week for at least 6 months were classified as regular users and served as the reference group throughout the analyses. We used unconditional logistic regression analyses to compute crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Compared with nonusers, regular aspirin users were not at reduced risk of endometrial cancer (adjusted OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.26), nor were women with the highest frequency, duration, or cumulative lifetime aspirin use. When the sample was divided by body mass index status, regular aspirin use was not associated with risk among women classified as normal weight or overweight, but a significant risk reduction was seen for obesewomen (adjusted OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.92). Significant decreases in risk were also observed for obesewomen with the greatest frequency, duration, and cumulative aspirin use. No significant associations in the overall sample or among obesewomen were noted for acetaminophen use. CONCLUSION: We observed no evidence of an overall chemoprotective effect of aspirin on endometrial cancer risk, but the significant risk reductions among obesewomen warrant further investigation.
Authors: Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Rayna K Matsuno; Galina Lurie; Lynne R Wilkens; Michael E Carney; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Marc T Goodman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Susan J Jordan; Renhua Na; Sharon E Johnatty; Lauren A Wise; Hans Olov Adami; Louise A Brinton; Chu Chen; Linda S Cook; Luigino Dal Maso; Immaculata De Vivo; Jo L Freudenheim; Christine M Friedenreich; Carlo La Vecchia; Susan E McCann; Kirsten B Moysich; Lingeng Lu; Sara H Olson; Julie R Palmer; Stacey Petruzella; Malcolm C Pike; Timothy R Rebbeck; Fulvio Ricceri; Harvey A Risch; Carlotta Sacerdote; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Todd R Sponholtz; Xiao Ou Shu; Amanda B Spurdle; Elisabete Weiderpass; Nicolas Wentzensen; Hannah P Yang; Herbert Yu; Penelope M Webb Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Amanda I Phipps; Garnet L Anderson; Barbara B Cochrane; Christopher I Li; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Gloria Y F Ho; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Polly A Newcomb Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Megan A Murphy; Britton Trabert; Hannah P Yang; Yikyung Park; Louise A Brinton; Patricia Hartge; Mark E Sherman; Albert Hollenbeck; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Joan Fortuny; Camelia Sima; Sharon Bayuga; Homer Wilcox; Katherine Pulick; Shameka Faulkner; Ann G Zauber; Sara H Olson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kim N Danforth; Gretchen L Gierach; Louise A Brinton; Albert R Hollenbeck; Hormuzd A Katki; Michael F Leitzmann; Arthur Schatzkin; James V Lacey Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2009-04-28