BACKGROUND: Advanced access has been forwarded as a strategy for reducing waiting times in primary care; however, previous evaluations have raised important issues regarding its appropriateness. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this paper are to assess the impact of advanced access on patient access to primary care services, and its broader effects on stakeholders. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of appointment data on 462 practices implementing advanced access, together with qualitative analysis of open survey responses and interviews with 28 practice staff. Appointment data recorded time to third available appointment for GP and practice nurse, together with the percentage of patients seen on their day of choice. Themes were identified from the interviews and survey responses and related to issues identified in previous research. RESULTS: The implementation of advanced access was associated with reductions in time to see practice nurses as well as GPs, and increases in the proportion of patients being seen on their day of choice. Interviewee and survey responses suggested that practice population characteristics may impact on the model, and some patient groups may be disadvantaged from the changes in the appointment systems seen in this study. Whilst experiences were mixed, the potential for broader changes to working practices of all practice staff was evident. CONCLUSIONS: In general, these results suggest that advanced access can have a positive impact across several aspects of primary care services, and not just the availability of GP appointments. However, it also highlights some problems, in that waiting times worsened in some practices and there were concerns that some vulnerable groups may be disadvantaged.
BACKGROUND: Advanced access has been forwarded as a strategy for reducing waiting times in primary care; however, previous evaluations have raised important issues regarding its appropriateness. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this paper are to assess the impact of advanced access on patient access to primary care services, and its broader effects on stakeholders. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of appointment data on 462 practices implementing advanced access, together with qualitative analysis of open survey responses and interviews with 28 practice staff. Appointment data recorded time to third available appointment for GP and practice nurse, together with the percentage of patients seen on their day of choice. Themes were identified from the interviews and survey responses and related to issues identified in previous research. RESULTS: The implementation of advanced access was associated with reductions in time to see practice nurses as well as GPs, and increases in the proportion of patients being seen on their day of choice. Interviewee and survey responses suggested that practice population characteristics may impact on the model, and some patient groups may be disadvantaged from the changes in the appointment systems seen in this study. Whilst experiences were mixed, the potential for broader changes to working practices of all practice staff was evident. CONCLUSIONS: In general, these results suggest that advanced access can have a positive impact across several aspects of primary care services, and not just the availability of GP appointments. However, it also highlights some problems, in that waiting times worsened in some practices and there were concerns that some vulnerable groups may be disadvantaged.
Authors: Chris Salisbury; Stephen Goodall; Alan A Montgomery; D Mark Pickin; Sarah Edwards; Fiona Sampson; Lucy Simons; Val Lattimer Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: John L Campbell; Mary Carter; Antoinette Davey; Martin J Roberts; Marc N Elliott; Martin Roland Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.386