Literature DB >> 16364113

The sensitivity of the premature infant pain profile - PIPP to measure pain in hospitalized neonates.

Rakel Bjorg Jonsdottir1, G Kristjansdottir.   

Abstract

AIM: The present study uses an Icelandic translation of the original version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) in order to assess its accuracy and sensitivity to the measure of pain in hospitalized neonates in Iceland. The PIPP is a composite tool developed to assess acute pain in preterm and term neonates.
METHODS: A crossover design, with a sample of 24 neonates, was used on three, routinely occurring events in the neonatal intensive care unit, where neonates were their own controls. The three events were baseline, non-pain and pain event. Neonates were independently assessed for their pain, using the Icelandic translation of the PIPP, at the bedside.
RESULTS: Repeated measures analysis yielded a statistically significant main effect for the three events (pain, non-pain and baseline), thus differentiating pain from non-pain and baseline events (F = 57.11; P < 0.0001). Pair-wise comparisons were subsequently carried out and the results show that PIPP scores at the pain event (11.72) were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than that at the non-pain event (6.04) and that at the baseline event (3.54; P < 0.0001). The PIPP scores at the non-pain event were also significantly higher than that at the baseline event (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that the PIPP measure is sensitive to a painful event and differentiates between stress and pain in a clinical context across linguistic barriers. The findings also revealed almost a complete correlation between the PIPP scores of the two independent nurse raters at all events (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Therefore the authors conclude that the Icelandic translation of the PIPP qualifies as a satisfying measure of pain responses in Icelandic neonates and can be recommended for use by clinicians and researchers. More research is, however, needed to further the accuracy and validity of the PIPP measure in general to assess pain in neonates in comparison to other pain measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16364113     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00603.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Julia Harris; Anne-Sylvie Ramelet; Monique van Dijk; Pavla Pokorna; Joke Wielenga; Lyvonne Tume; Dick Tibboel; Erwin Ista
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effects of white noise on procedural pain-related cortical response and pain score in neonates: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xuyan Ren; Li Li; Siya Lin; Chunxia Zhong; Bin Wang
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Multi-modal pain assessment: are near-infrared spectroscopy, skin conductance, salivary cortisol, physiologic parameters, and Neonatal Facial Coding System interrelated during venepuncture in healthy, term neonates?

Authors:  Jean-Michel Roué; Stéphane Rioualen; Julie Gendras; Laurent Misery; Maëlenn Gouillou; Jacques Sizun
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Defining and distinguishing infant behavioral states using acoustic cry analysis: is colic painful?

Authors:  Joanna J Parga; Sharon Lewin; Juanita Lewis; Diana Montoya-Williams; Abeer Alwan; Brianna Shaul; Carol Han; Susan Y Bookheimer; Sherry Eyer; Mirella Dapretto; Lonnie Zeltzer; Lauren Dunlap; Usha Nookala; Daniel Sun; Bianca H Dang; Ariana E Anderson
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.756

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.