OBJECTIVE: This study presents a decision model that predicts long-term disability among construction workers. METHODS: Risk factors were identified in two cohort studies among construction workers and evaluated in validation samples of smaller cohort studies among Dutch construction workers. The risk estimates (odds ratios) were used in a logistic regression model to calculate the probability of long-term disability in the next 4 years for a particular construction worker, subject to a specific combination of risk factors. The a priori probability was set equal to the overall long-term disability risk among the youngest construction workers (< 30 years) with a relatively short exposure history. RESULTS: According to literature findings, the risk estimate for work ability was set with the odds ratio at 2.0 for good work ability, 5.0 for moderate work ability, and 10.0 for bad work ability. Age-dependent risks were set at odds ratios of 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 for the age groups of 30-34 years, 35-44 years, and 45-54 years, respectively. A sickness absence period of > or = 3 months had an odds ratio of 2.0, and severe musculoskeletal complaints had an odds ratio of 3.0. Since the number of construction workers older than 55 years was rather small and heavily biased by a healthy worker effect, it was decided to limit the applicability of the decision model to workers aged 20-55 years. The decision model used four risk factors and predicted a 40-fold difference in disability risk between construction workers with all four risk factors present (0.79) and those without any risk factor (0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The decision model presented the combined effect of different risk factors on the risk of an individual worker becoming disabled within 4 years. Evaluation studies will need to demonstrate whether the application of this decision model is helpful in identifying workers at risk for long-term disability and will facilitate appropriate intervention at the individual level.
OBJECTIVE: This study presents a decision model that predicts long-term disability among construction workers. METHODS: Risk factors were identified in two cohort studies among construction workers and evaluated in validation samples of smaller cohort studies among Dutch construction workers. The risk estimates (odds ratios) were used in a logistic regression model to calculate the probability of long-term disability in the next 4 years for a particular construction worker, subject to a specific combination of risk factors. The a priori probability was set equal to the overall long-term disability risk among the youngest construction workers (< 30 years) with a relatively short exposure history. RESULTS: According to literature findings, the risk estimate for work ability was set with the odds ratio at 2.0 for good work ability, 5.0 for moderate work ability, and 10.0 for bad work ability. Age-dependent risks were set at odds ratios of 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 for the age groups of 30-34 years, 35-44 years, and 45-54 years, respectively. A sickness absence period of > or = 3 months had an odds ratio of 2.0, and severe musculoskeletal complaints had an odds ratio of 3.0. Since the number of construction workers older than 55 years was rather small and heavily biased by a healthy worker effect, it was decided to limit the applicability of the decision model to workers aged 20-55 years. The decision model used four risk factors and predicted a 40-fold difference in disability risk between construction workers with all four risk factors present (0.79) and those without any risk factor (0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The decision model presented the combined effect of different risk factors on the risk of an individual worker becoming disabled within 4 years. Evaluation studies will need to demonstrate whether the application of this decision model is helpful in identifying workers at risk for long-term disability and will facilitate appropriate intervention at the individual level.
Authors: Laudry van der Meer; Fenna R M Leijten; Swenneke G Heuvel; Jan F Ybema; Astrid de Wind; Alex Burdorf; Goedele A Geuskens Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2016-06
Authors: J S Boschman; H F van der Molen; M H W Frings-Dresen; J K Sluiter Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Karina Glies Vincents Seeberg; Sebastian Venge Skovlund; Rúni Bláfoss; Kristina Thomassen; Lasse Malchow-Møller; Emil Sundstrup; Lars Louis Andersen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Inger M Oellingrath; Marit Müller De Bortoli; Martin Veel Svendsen; Anne Kristin Møller Fell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Jane E Ferrie; Jan Hagberg; Jenny Head; Hugo Westerlund; Jussi Vahtera; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Mehdi El Fassi; Valery Bocquet; Nicole Majery; Marie Lise Lair; Sophie Couffignal; Philippe Mairiaux Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lisanne M Möller; Ronald Brands; Judith K Sluiter; Judith Schouten; Ferdinand W Wit; Peter Reiss; Maria Prins; Ineke G Stolte Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.015