Literature DB >> 16362188

The present role of percutaneous cervical cordotomy for the treatment of cancer pain.

Ben J P Crul1, Laura M Blok, Jan van Egmond, Robert T M van Dongen.   

Abstract

The results obtained by percutaneous cervical cordotomy (PCC) were analysed in 43 terminally ill cancer patients treated in our institution from 1998 to 2001. We wished to determine whether there is still a place for PCC in the actual clinical situation with its wide choice of pain therapies. All patients had severe unilateral pain due to cancer, resistant to opioids and co-analgesics. Following PCC, mean pain intensity was reduced from Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 7.2 to 1.1. At the end of life, pain had increased to NRS 2.9. Initially following PCC a good result (NRS<3) was obtained in 95% of patients. At the end of life, a good result was still present in 69% of patients. Mean duration of survival after the intervention was 118 days (2-1460). In general, complications were mild and mostly subsided within 3-4 days. There was one case of partial paresis of the ipsilateral leg. PCC remains a valuable treatment in patients with treatment-resistant cancer pain and still deserves a place in the treatment of terminal cancer patients with severe unilateral neuropathic or incidence pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16362188      PMCID: PMC3451957          DOI: 10.1007/s10194-005-0145-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Headache Pain        ISSN: 1129-2369            Impact factor:   7.277


  7 in total

1.  Web-based collaborative care intervention to manage cancer-related symptoms in the palliative care setting.

Authors:  Jennifer L Steel; David A Geller; Kevin H Kim; Lisa H Butterfield; Michael Spring; Jonathan Grady; Weiing Sun; Wallis Marsh; Michael Antoni; Mary Amanda Dew; Vicki Helgeson; Richard Schulz; Allan Tsung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Five-year follow-up of a cordotomy.

Authors:  Jan J Meeuse; Arnoud C M Vervest; Johannes H van der Hoeven; An K L Reyners
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Neuroablative Procedures for Patients With Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed M Raslan; Sharona Ben-Haim; Steven M Falowski; André G Machado; Jonathan Miller; Julie G Pilitsis; William S Rosenberg; Joshua M Rosenow; Jennifer Sweet; Ashwin Viswanathan; Christopher J Winfree; Jason M Schwalb
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Cancer pain management-current status.

Authors:  Deepak Thapa; V Rastogi; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04

5.  Chronic opioid therapy and opioid tolerance: a new hypothesis.

Authors:  Joel S Goldberg
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-14

6.  Clinical management of pain in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Claribel P L Simmons; Nicholas Macleod; Barry J A Laird
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-10-08

7.  Percutaneous cervical cordotomy for cancer-related pain: national data.

Authors:  Marlise Poolman; Matthew Makin; Jess Briggs; Kate Scofield; Nick Campkin; Michael Williams; Manohar Lal Sharma; Barry Laird; Catriona R Mayland
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.568

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.