Literature DB >> 16361560

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sequences of the rebeccamycin analogue NSC 655649 and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Alejandro D Ricart1, Lisa A Hammond, John G Kuhn, Chris H Takimoto, Andrew Goetz, Bahram Forouzesh, Leonardo Forero, Jose L Ochoa-Bayona, Kristin Berg, Anthony W Tolcher, Eric K Rowinsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering NSC 655649, a water-soluble rebeccamycin analogue that inhibits both topoisomerases I and II, in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in adults with solid malignancies. Major toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration were also assessed. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: NSC 655649 was administered as a 60-minute i.v. infusion; CDDP was given i.v. before or after NSC 655649 on day 1. Each patient was treated with alternating drug sequences every 3 weeks; doses of each drug were escalated in separate cohorts of new patients. Sequential dose escalation of NSC 655649 or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutations of NSC 655649/CDDP: 440/50, 550/50, and 440/75 mg/m2. After the maximum tolerated dose level was determined, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to permit further dose escalation was explored.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with 70 courses of NSC 655649/CDDP. Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity. The incidence of severe neutropenia, often associated with severe thrombocytopenia, was unacceptably high in minimally pretreated patients at the NSC 655649/CDDP dose level of 550/50 mg/m2 without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Major pharmacokinetic interactions between NSC 655649 and CDDP were not apparent. No relevant sequence-dependent differences in toxicity or pharmacokinetic variables occurred. Three patients had partial responses.
CONCLUSIONS: NSC 655649 and CDDP were well tolerated by minimally pretreated subjects at 440 and 50 mg/m2, respectively. Neither pharmacokinetic interactions between the agents nor sequence-dependent toxicologic or pharmacokinetic effects were apparent. The tolerance and preliminary activity observed with this combination suggest that disease-directed evaluations of the regimen are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16361560     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  2 in total

1.  A phase I study of rebeccamycin analog in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Charles J Nock; Joanna M Brell; Joseph A Bokar; Matthew M Cooney; Brenda Cooper; Joseph Gibbons; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Sudhir Manda; Panayiotis Savvides; Scot C Remick; Percy Ivy; Afshin Dowlati
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Becatecarin (rebeccamycin analog, NSC 655649) is a transport substrate and induces expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter, ABCG2, in lung carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Robert W Robey; Tomasz Obrzut; Suneet Shukla; Orsolya Polgar; Sira Macalou; Julian C Bahr; Attilio Di Pietro; Suresh V Ambudkar; Susan E Bates
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.