Literature DB >> 16361556

Methylation of the DPYD promoter: an alternative mechanism for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in cancer patients.

Hany H Ezzeldin1, Adam M Lee, Lori K Mattison, Robert B Diasio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, a known pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity, has been detected in 3% to 5% of the population. Genotypic studies have identified >32 sequence variants in the DPYD gene; however, in a number of cases, sequence variants could not explain the molecular basis of DPD deficiency. Recent studies in cell lines indicate that hypermethylation of the DPYD promoter might down-regulate DPD expression. The current study investigates the role of methylation in cancer patients with an unexplained molecular basis of DPD deficiency. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: DPD deficiency was identified phenotypically by both enzyme assay and uracil breath test, and genotypically by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. The methylation status was evaluated in PCR products (209 bp) of bisulfite-modified DPYD promoter, using a novel denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography method that distinguishes between methylated and unmethylated alleles. Clinical samples included five volunteers with normal DPD enzyme activity, five DPD-deficient volunteers, and five DPD-deficient cancer patients with a history of 5-FU toxicity.
RESULTS: No evidence of methylation was detected in samples from volunteers with normal DPD. Methylation was detected in five of five DPD-deficient volunteers and in three of five of the DPD-deficient cancer patient samples. Of note, one of the two samples from patients with DPD-deficient cancer with no evidence of methylation had the mutation DPYD*2A, whereas the other had DPYD*13. DISCUSSION: Methylation of the DPYD promoter region is associated with down-regulation of DPD activity in clinical samples and should be considered as a potentially important regulatory mechanism of DPD activity and basis for 5-FU toxicity in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16361556     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  33 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics, a main actor in a many-sided approach to severe 5-FU toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Guido Bocci; Antonello Di Paolo; Cecilia Barbara; Gianluca Masi; Lorenzo Fornaro; Fotios Loupakis; Giacomo Allegrini; Alfredo Falcone; Mario Del Tacca; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Can knowledge of germline markers of toxicity optimize dosing and efficacy of cancer therapy?

Authors:  Daniel Crona; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  microRNAs miR-27a and miR-27b directly regulate liver dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression through two conserved binding sites.

Authors:  Steven M Offer; Gabriel L Butterfield; Calvin R Jerde; Croix C Fossum; Natalie J Wegner; Robert B Diasio
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Molecular Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Disparities: Current Status and Perspective.

Authors:  Upender Manne; Trafina Jadhav; Balananda-Dhurjati Kumar Putcha; Temesgen Samuel; Shivani Soni; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; Esther A Suswam
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2016-09-20

5.  Frequent intragenic rearrangements of DPYD in colorectal tumours.

Authors:  A B P van Kuilenburg; M-C Etienne-Grimaldi; A Mahamat; J Meijer; P Laurent-Puig; S Olschwang; M-P Gaub; R C M Hennekam; D Benchimol; S Houry; C Letoublon; F-N Gilly; D Pezet; T Andre; J-L Faucheron; A Abderrahim-Ferkoune; R Vijzelaar; B Pradere; G Milano
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  DNA methylotype analysis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jinsheng Yu; Robert R Freimuth; Robert Culverhouse; Sharon Marsh; Mark A Watson; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Predictive Factors for Response and Toxicity in Chemotherapy: Pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Hanna K Sanoff; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Semin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-12

8.  Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms associated with infertility.

Authors:  Sheroy Minocherhomji; Prochi F Madon; Firuza R Parikh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-08-05

9.  Promoter methylation and large intragenic rearrangements of DPYD are not implicated in severe toxicity to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Authors:  Joana Savva-Bordalo; João Ramalho-Carvalho; Manuela Pinheiro; Vera L Costa; Angelo Rodrigues; Paula C Dias; Isabel Veiga; Manuela Machado; Manuel R Teixeira; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Predicting clinical outcome of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for colon cancer patients: is the CpG island methylator phenotype the 5-fluorouracil-responsive subgroup?

Authors:  Barry Iacopetta; Kazuyuki Kawakami; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.