Literature DB >> 16361138

Lymph node imaging: multidetector CT (MDCT).

Paul M Silverman1.   

Abstract

Advances in cross-sectional imaging, including conventional and helical (spiral) CT and multidetector (MDCT) and MR imaging, now allow detailed evaluation of the anatomy and pathology of the neck and thoracic inlet. The major structures are identified by their appearance and that of contrasting fatty tissue planes surrounding the soft tissues. These structures include the larynx, trachea, thyroid, and parathyroid glands as well as the vessels, lymph node chains, nerves, and supporting muscles. A thorough understanding of the normal cross-sectional anatomy is fundamental to properly interpret pathologic processes. Pathologic processes include both solid and cystic masses. Most solid masses are enlarged lymph nodes. In contrast, cystic masses are of variable pathology, and their characteristic appearances and locations with respect to normal neck anatomy allow a confident diagnosis to be made from a brief differential diagnostic spectrum. International Cancer Imaging Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16361138      PMCID: PMC1665307          DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Imaging        ISSN: 1470-7330            Impact factor:   3.909


Technique

Computed tomography (CT) is performed with the patient supine in quiet respiration [1-4]. A pad placed beneath the patient’s scapulae produces mild hyperextension of the neck and provides consistent images perpendicular to the long axis of the neck, minimizing dental artifacts. Scans are obtained using 3–5 mm or thinner contiguous slices. Multidetector CT (MDCT) affords optimal imaging in a single breath-hold, maximizing contrast enhancement and minimizing misregistration which improves visualization of small anatomic structures without rescanning or additional radiation. Intravenous contrast material is a prerequisite for enhancement of vascular structures. Its use facilitates differentiation of vessels from lymph nodes and the characterization of pathology.

Normal anatomy

The classic surgical approach divides the neck into two spaces, the anterior and posterior triangles (Fig. 1). The anterior triangle contains the major structures of the neck: hypopharynx, larynx, trachea, esophagus, thyroid, parathyroid, and salivary glands as well as the carotid sheath, nerves, and lymph nodes. Each anterior triangle is bordered posterolaterally by the sternocleidomastoid muscle and superiorly by the mandible. The anterior triangle is subdivided by the hyoid bone into suprahyoid and infrahyoid portions. The suprahyoid provides support for the floor of the mouth and contains sublingual, submandibular salivary glands and associated nodes. The infrahyoid portion contains the remaining components (Fig. 2). The posterior triangle is bounded anteriorly by the sternocleidomastoid muscle and posteriorly by the trapezius and is subdivided by the posterior belly of the omohyoid muscle. The space is primarily filled with fat and includes the hypoglossal nerve, vessels, and nodes.

Normal lymph nodes of the neck

The location of the various lymph node groups of the neck is most succinctly understood using a simplification of the Rouviere classification [5]. Nodal classification is critical for staging tumor extent [6-18]. Lymph nodes of the neck may be divided into 10 major groups [7-18]. The first six groups (I–VI) form a lymphoid collar at the junction of the head and neck (Fig. 2). These nodes are quite superficial, are usually accessible to palpation on physical examination and are commonly referred to as collar nodes: occipital, mastoid, parotid, submandibular, and facial submental. Two groups of nodes lie deep within this lymphoid collar and are not accessible to clinical examination. Pathologic enlargement (>1.5 cm) allows detection. These nodes—groups VII, sublingual, and VIII, retropharyngeal—are often the site of metastases from carcinoma of the nasopharynx, the base of the tongue, and the tonsils (Fig. 3). The anterior cervical group (IX) consists of superficial (Fig. 4B) and deep components (Fig. 4C). These nodes may be the site of metastases from primary tumors in the thyroid, larynx, and lung. The lateral cervical nodes (group X) are also composed of superficial and deep chains (Fig. 5). This important deep group of nodes consists of three chains that form a triangle. The anterior portion is the internal jugular chain, the posterior portion is the spinal accessory chain, and the inferior component is the transverse cervical chain. Of these groups, the most important in staging head and neck tumors are the nodes along the internal jugular chain. A classification used by our surgical colleagues is shown in Table 1. Although the table is useful, the classification can easily be integrated into our system by carefully describing in reports the anatomic location of the nodes.
Table 1

1997 AJCC nodal (N) staging systems for cervical lymph nodes

Level Classification criteria
NXThe regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed (clinically)
N0There are no regional metastatic lymph nodes present
N1There is metastasis to a single ipsilateral lymph node that is 3 cm or less in greatest dimension
N2There is metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node that is between 3 and 6 cm in greatest dimension; there are multiple ipsilateral
lymph nodes, none of which are greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension; or there are bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none of
which are greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N2aThere is metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node that is between 3 and 6 cm in greatest dimension
N2bThere are multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none of which are greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N2cThere are bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none of which are greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N3There is metastasis in lymph nodes that are more than 6 cm in greatest dimension

A new imaging-based classification for abnormal nodes

Recently, the results of a study produced an imaging-based nodal classification for the evaluation of metastatic neck adenopathy. Imaging landmarks were identified to create a nodal classification similar to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery [9–11, 18–24] (Table 2). This system was defined to ensure a more consistent nodal classification and to eliminate confusion with existing clinically based classifications. Imaging was chosen as a pivotal study because it identifies clinically silent nodes. Table 2 summarizes this new imaging-based classification (Figs. 6–19). A roman numeral is used to define the levels referenced to anatomic names, such as supraclavicular, retropharyngeal, carotid, facial, occipital, postauricular, and other superficial nodes; these anatomic terms are still widely used. This classification brings some improved precision and reproducibility to the staging of head and neck diseases.
Table 2

Clinical classification of neck nodes

t Definition of nodes
IAbove hyoid bone
Below mylohyoid muscle
Anterior to back of submandibular gland
IABetween medial margins of anterior bellies of digastric muscles
Previously classified as submental nodes
IBPosterolateral to level IA nodes
Previously classified as submandibular nodes
IIFrom Skull base to level of lower body of hyoid bone
Posterior to back of submandibular gland
Anterior to back of sternocleidomastoid muscle
IIAAnterior, lateral, medial, or posterior to internal jugular vein
Inseparable from internal jugular vein (if posterior to vein)
Previously classified as upper internal jugular nodes
IIBPosterior to internal jugular vein with pat plane separating nodes and vein
Previously classified as upper spinal accessory nodes
IIIFrom level of lower body of hyoid bone to level of lower cricoid cartilage arch
Anterior to back of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Previously known as mid jugular nodes
IVFrom level of lower cricoid cartilage arch to level of clavicle
Anterior to line connecting back of sternocleidomastoid muscle and posterolateral margin of anterior scalene muscle
Lateral to carotid arteries
Previously known as low jugular nodes
VPosterior to back of sternocleidomastoid muscle from skull base to level of lower cricoid arch
From level of lower cricoid arch to level of clavicle as seen on each axial scan
Posterior to line connecting back of sternocleidomastoid muscle and posterolateral margin of anterior scalene muscle
Anterior to anterior edge of trapezius muscle
VAFrom skull base to level of bottom of cricoid cartilage arch
Posterior to back of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Previously known as upper level V nodes
VBFrom level of lower cricoid arch to level of clavicle as seen on each axial scan
Posterior to line connecting back of sternocleidomastoid muscle and posterolateral margin of anterior scalene muscle
Previously known as lower level V nodes
VIBetween carotid arteries from level of lower body of hyoid bone to level superior to top of manubrium
Previously known as visceral nodes
VIIBetween carotid arteries below level of top of manubrium
Caudal to level of innominate vein
Previously known as superior mediastinal nodes
SupraclavicularAt or caudal to level of clavicle as seen on each axial scan
Above and medial to ribs
RetropharyngealWithin 2 cm of skull base and medial to internal carotid arteries

Nodal disease

Clinical examination alone is highly inaccurate in staging nodal disease in patients with head and neck tumors. Therefore, prophylactic X-ray therapy can be used to treat patients with occult metastases, which are estimated to occur in 15%–20% of these individuals. Because normal nodes in the neck may be identified on high-quality scans, criteria have been established to define lymphadenopathy: (1) a discrete mass great than 1.0–1.5 cm; (2) an ill-defined mass in a lymph node area; (3) multiple nodes of 6–15 mm; and (4) obliteration of tissue planes around vessels in a nonirradiated neck. A nodal mass with central low density is specifically indicative of tumor necrosis [5-8]. Less common, nonnodal solid masses include neurovascular tumors (paraganglioma, neurofibroma, hemangioma), primary neoplasms (fibroma, sarcoma), congenital lesions (teratoma, ectopic thyroid), trauma (hematoma), lesions of the bone (plasmacytoma, aneurysmal bone cyst), and infection. Specific imaging features aid the differential diagnosis. Paragangliomas (carotid body tumor) occur in the carotid space and consistently show early and persistently dense enhancement after the administration of contrast material. Acute hematomas are characterized by an intrinsically high CT attenuation and high intensity on T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Metastases are located in the expected site of the major lymph node chains of the neck. Many investigators now use 1.0 cm as an effective size criteria for positive nodes in a patient population at high risk. Nodes in the upper neck tend to be large because of repeated respiratory infections; therefore, more liberal size criteria should be accepted. With the use of more liberal criteria, 80% of nodes will be metastatic and 20% will be benign hyperplastic. Important caveats include the follow: (1) regardless of primary site, a single ipsilateral node decreases survival by 50% and a contralateral node halves survival again; (2) extranodal extension is the best indicator of treatment failure and decreases survival by 50%; (3) posterior triangle nodes, with the exception of lymphoma, indicate a poor prognosis; and (4) nodes in the low internal jugular chain have a poor prognosis because proximal spread has often occurred. These caveats are helpful when dealing with the assessment of lymphadenopathy in this region. In summary, careful analysis of nodes in the neck and knowledge of the various compartments is critical in the assessment and staging of primary head and neck malignancies.
  15 in total

1.  Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy.

Authors:  P M Som; H D Curtin; A A Mancuso
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Spiral CT in evaluation of head and neck lesions: work in progress.

Authors:  J N Suojanen; S K Mukherji; D E Dupuy; J H Takahashi; P Costello
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of the Academy's Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology.

Authors:  K T Robbins; J E Medina; G T Wolfe; P A Levine; R B Sessions; C W Pruet
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-06

Review 4.  Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  P M Som
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Distribution of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts.

Authors:  R Lindberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  An imaging-based classification for the cervical nodes designed as an adjunct to recent clinically based nodal classifications.

Authors:  P M Som; H D Curtin; A A Mancuso
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-04

7.  Detection of lymph node metastases in the neck: radiologic criteria.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; J A Castelijns; G B Snow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CT of cervical lymph node cancer.

Authors:  A A Mancuso; D Maceri; D Rice; W Hanafee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Computed tomography of cystic neck masses.

Authors:  P M Silverman; M Korobkin; A V Moore
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Computed tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes: normal anatomy, variants of normal, and applications in staging head and neck cancer. Part I: normal anatomy.

Authors:  A A Mancuso; H R Harnsberger; A S Muraki; M H Stevens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Simultaneous occurrence of Hodgkin's disease and tubercular lymphadenitis in the same cervical lymph node: a rare presentation.

Authors:  Kunal Mahajan; Gunjan Gupta; Davinder Pal Singh; Aditi Mahajan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-06

2.  Spectral CT imaging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: evaluation of image quality and status of lymph nodes.

Authors:  Aiyin Li; Hui Liang; Wei Li; Zhongzhou Wang; Tao Pang; Jun Li; Hao Shi; Chengqi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A case of concomitant Hodgkin's lymphoma with tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ramanjula C Reddy; Meghena Mathew; Ashok Parameswaran; R Narasimhan
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2014-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.