Literature DB >> 16360459

Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer.

Frederico Ramalho Romero1, Karen Richter Pereira dos Santos Romero, Marcus Augusto Elias de Mattos, Carlos Ricardo Camargo Garcia, Roni de Carvalho Fernandes, Marjo Deninson Cardenuto Perez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare sexual function and satisfaction before and after partial penectomy and to evaluate possible dysfunctions that could modify postoperative sexual functioning.
METHODS: A total of 18 patients underwent a personal interview and answered the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire to determine erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction with sexual life. Domain scores were computed by summing the scores for individual answers, and the final scores were compared before and after partial penectomy.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 52 years. The medium penile length after partial penectomy was 4 cm in the flaccid state; 55.6% of patients reported erectile function that allowed sexual intercourse. The main reason for not resuming sexual intercourse appeared to be related to feelings of shame owing to the small penis size and the absence of the glans penis found in 50% of sexually abstinent patients. Surgical complications also compromised the resumption of sexual activity after amputation in 33.3% of these patients. However, 66.7% sustained the same frequency and level of sexual desire as before surgery, and 72.2% continued to have ejaculation and orgasm every time they had sexual stimulation or intercourse. Only 33.3% maintained their preoperative sexual intercourse frequency and were satisfied with their sexual relationship with their partners and their overall sex life.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative and postoperative scores were statistically different for all domains of sexual function after partial penectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360459     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  37 in total

1.  Sexual function after surgical treatment for penile cancer: Which organ-sparing approach gives the best results?

Authors:  Omid Sedigh; Marco Falcone; Carlo Ceruti; Massimiliano Timpano; Mirko Preto; Marco Oderda; Franklin Kuehhas; Mattia Sibona; Arianna Gillo; Paolo Gontero; Luigi Rolle; Bruno Frea
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [Organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer].

Authors:  B Schlenker; C Gratzke; D Tilki; E Hungerhuber; P Schneede; O Reich; C G Stief; M Seitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Organ-sparing treatment of penile cancer with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Johannes Seibold; Vratislav Strnad; Rainer Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Reconstructive Possibilities.

Authors:  Gabriel Djedovic; Michael Sohn; Ulrich M Rieger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  [Urethral centralization and pseudo-glans formation after partial penectomy].

Authors:  J Kranz; A Parnham; M Albersen; V Sahdev; M Ziada; R Nigam; A Muneer; J Steffens; P Malone
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Psychological Impacts of Male Sexual Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  David K Twitchell; Daniela A Wittmann; James M Hotaling; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

7.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: a systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer.

Authors:  Satish B Maddineni; Maurice M Lau; Vijay K Sangar
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.