Literature DB >> 16360356

Implications from the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study for the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

Michael Clearfield1, John R Downs, Michael Lee, Alex Langendorfer, Walter McConathy, Antonio M Gotto.   

Abstract

The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) first reported its results in 1998, before the 2001 publication of the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines (NCEP-ATP III) and 2004 update. Our objective was to investigate the impact of these guidelines on the AFCAPS/TexCAPS cohort. The main outcome measures were the event rates of first acute major coronary events (AMCEs), which were reduced 39% by lovastatin (95% confidence interval [CI] 21% to 53%, p <0.001) in the 65% of the cohort eligible for drug therapy and by 34% (95% CI -9% to 60%, p = 0.108) in the remaining 35% for whom drug therapy was considered optional. The evaluation of other guideline components included a 44% (95% CI 27% to 58%, p <0.001) reduction in AMCEs in subjects with baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dl and a 41% (95% CI 19% to 57%) reduction in AMCEs in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. In the recent update, patients who had a moderately high risk of coronary heart disease and a baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 100 to 130 mg/dl could be considered for therapy with a medication to lower the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level to <100 mg/dl. A total of 334 subjects (5.1%) were in this group, in whom lovastatin reduced the risk of AMCEs by 68% (95% CI 12% to 88%, p = 0.027). However, 21% of the AMCEs were missed by the guidelines. Metabolic syndrome was noted in 48% of these subjects and may help define those in whom treatment with a medication is now considered optional. In conclusion, the ability of the ATP III guidelines and its update has markedly improved our ability to define coronary heart disease risk; however, other components of the guidelines, such as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the optional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target goal of <100 mg/dl, still require additional evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360356     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  Another inconvenient truth: combining the risks from obesity and metabolic syndrome with global warming.

Authors:  Michael Clearfield
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  The role of statins in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Ott; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  The evolution or revolution of statin therapy in primary prevention: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Patricia Rehfield; Colin Kopes-Kerr; Michael Clearfield
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  The "New Deadly Quartet" for cardiovascular disease in the 21st century: obesity, metabolic syndrome, inflammation and climate change: how does statin therapy fit into this equation?

Authors:  Michael Clearfield; Melissa Pearce; Yasmin Nibbe; David Crotty; Alesia Wagner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Statins and the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Michael Clearfield
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Should we treat all patients with coronary heart disease or the equivalent with statins?

Authors:  Peter Baginsky
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Do statins reduce events in patients with metabolic syndrome?

Authors:  Sarah P Towne; Eddie Thara
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Management of dyslipidemias in the presence of the metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Niina Matikainen; Marja-Riitta Taskinen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Nurse health and lifestyle modification versus standard care in 40 to 70 year old regional adults: study protocol of the Management to Optimise Diabetes and mEtabolic syndrome Risk reduction via Nurse-led intervention (MODERN) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Melinda J Carrington; Paul Zimmet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.