Literature DB >> 16360257

Infertility: testing a helpseeking model.

Lynn White1, Julia McQuillan, Arthur L Greil, David R Johnson.   

Abstract

This paper uses data from a study of 196 infertile women from the Midwestern US to examine a general theory of helpseeking behavior applied to infertility. All of these women report meeting the medical definition of infertility--12 months or more of regular intercourse without conception--at some point in their lives. Only 35 percent of this sample of infertile women identified themselves as having had fertility problems and only 40 percent had sought medical treatment. Drawing on prior theories of helpseeking, we examine the effects of symptom salience, life course cues, attitudes, predisposing factors, and enabling conditions on helpseeking. We posit a model in which a cognitive dimension (perceived infertility) mediates between these predictors and medical helpseeking. Symptom salience (experienced infertility while actively trying to get pregnant), low parity, and poor subjective health are significantly related to perceived infertility, which is, in turn, significantly associated with helpseeking for infertility. Supporting the conclusion that the cognitive dimension of identifying oneself as infertile is critical to helpseeking, the relationship of symptom salience to helpseeking is partially mediated by perceived problems. Internal health locus of control is associated with lower odds of helpseeking but not to perceived infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360257     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  Responding to Infertility: Lessons From a Growing Body of Research and Suggested Guidelines for Practice.

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2017-10

2.  Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan; Michele Lowry; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Specifying the effects of religion on medical helpseeking: the case of infertility.

Authors:  Arthur Greil; Julia McQuillan; Maureen Benjamins; David R Johnson; Katherine M Johnson; Chelsea R Heinz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Partnered Decisions? U.S. Couples and Medical Help-seeking for Infertility.

Authors:  Katherine M Johnson; David R Johnson
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2009-10-01

Review 5.  The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen Slauson-Blevins; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-12-09

6.  The hidden infertile: infertile women without pregnancy intent in the United States.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan; Katherine Johnson; Katherine Slauson-Blevins; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Is infertility resolution associated with a change in women's well-being?

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Stacy M Tiemeyer; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Does fertility-specific distress vary by race/ethnicity among a probability sample of women in the United States?

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan; Delida Sanchez
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2014-03-24

9.  Does Self-Identifying as Having a Health Problem Precede Medical Contact? The Case of Infertility.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Katherine M Johnson; Julia McQuillan; Karina M Shreffler; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Michele Lowry
Journal:  Sociol Focus       Date:  2020-08-08

10.  "Trying" times: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2010-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.