Fabrice Barlési1, William Jacot, Philippe Astoul, Jean-Louis Pujol. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Université de la Méditerranée, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Thoracic Oncology, Fédération des Maladies Respiratoires, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, France. fabrice.barlesi@mail.ap-hm.fr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005. RESULTS: Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLC patients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies. CONCLUSION: Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLC patients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.
BACKGROUND: Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005. RESULTS: Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLCpatients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies. CONCLUSION: Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLCpatients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.
Authors: Christopher G Azzoli; Sherman Baker; Sarah Temin; William Pao; Timothy Aliff; Julie Brahmer; David H Johnson; Janessa L Laskin; Gregory Masters; Daniel Milton; Luke Nordquist; David G Pfister; Steven Piantadosi; Joan H Schiller; Reily Smith; Thomas J Smith; John R Strawn; David Trent; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wolfgang Schuette; Hans Tesch; Hartwig Büttner; Thomas Krause; Victoria Soldatenkova; Clemens Stoffregen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Yoon Ho Ko; Myung Ah Lee; Yeong Seon Hong; Kyung Shik Lee; Hyun Jin Park; Ie Ryung Yoo; Yeon Sil Kim; Young Kyoon Kim; Keon Hyun Jo; Young Pil Wang; Kyo Young Lee; Jin Hyoung Kang Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 3.165
Authors: T Berghmans; J J Lafitte; J Lecomte; C G Alexopoulos; O Van Cutsem; V Giner; A Efremidis; M C Berchier; T Collon; A P Meert; A Scherpereel; V Ninane; N Leclercq; M Paesmans; J P Sculier Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 7.640