Literature DB >> 16360062

Cardiac resynchronization with sequential biventricular pacing for the treatment of moderate-to-severe heart failure.

Angel R León1, William T Abraham, Susan Brozena, James P Daubert, Westby G Fisher, John C Gurley, Chang Seng Liang, George Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The InSync III study evaluated sequential cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure and prolonged QRS.
BACKGROUND: Simultaneous CRT improves hemodynamic and clinical performance in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS. Recent evidence suggests that sequentially stimulating the ventricles might provide additional benefit.
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, six-month trial enrolled a total of 422 patients to determine the effectiveness of sequential CRT in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV HF and a prolonged QRS. The study evaluated: whether patients receiving sequential CRT for six months experienced improvement in 6-min hall walk (6MHW) distance, NYHA functional class, and quality of life (QoL) over control group patients from the reported Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) trial; whether sequential CRT increased stroke volume compared to simultaneous CRT; and whether an increase in stroke volume translated into greater clinical improvements compared to patients receiving simultaneous CRT.
RESULTS: InSync III patients experienced greater improvement in 6MHW, NYHA functional class, and QoL at six months compared to control (all p < 0.0001). Optimization of the sequential pacing increased (median 7.3%) stroke volume in 77% of patients. No additional improvement in NYHA functional class or QoL was seen compared to the simultaneous CRT group; however, InSync III patients demonstrated greater exercise capacity.
CONCLUSIONS: Sequential CRT provided most patients with a modest increase in stroke volume above that achieved during simultaneous CRT. Patients receiving sequential CRT had improved exercise capacity, but no change in functional status or QoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360062     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  34 in total

Review 1.  Optimal use of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Cheuk-Man Yu; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Johan de Sutter; Nico Van de Veire; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Effect of periodic pacemaker optimization on left atrial reverse remodeling in long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Guangwei Pan; Zhiqiang Liu; Pengyi He; Yuchun Yang; Yuming Mu; Wei Han; Muhuyati Wulasihan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  [Optimized CRT programming: relevance and practical application].

Authors:  F Bode; F Schütte
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-09

Review 4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Dire need for targeted left ventricular lead placement and optimal device programming.

Authors:  Sokratis Pastromas; Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-26

Review 5.  How to improve outcomes: should we put more emphasis on programming and medical care and less on patient selection?

Authors:  Laszlo Buga
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 6.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-06

7.  The reliability of cardiogenic impedance and correlation with echocardiographic and plethysmographic parameters for predicting CRT time intervals post implantation.

Authors:  Elena Sciaraffia; Matthew R Ginks; John Gustafsson; Andreas Karlsson; C Aldo Rinaldi; Carina Blomström Lundqvist
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Brian T Schuler; Angel R León
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Lack of clinical predictors of optimal V-V delay in patients with cardiac resynchronization devices.

Authors:  Avi Fischer; Riple Hansalia; Samantha Buckley; Robin Goldberg; Martin Goldman; Paul Muntner; Davendra Mehta; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Recent advances in cardiac resynchronization therapy: echocardiographic modalities, patient selection, optimization, non-responders--all you need to know for more efficient CRT.

Authors:  Harry Pavlopoulos; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.