Literature DB >> 16359533

The role of genetic testing in soft tissue sarcoma.

C R Antonescu1.   

Abstract

Soft tissue tumours represent a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal lesions and their classification continues to evolve as a result of incorporating advances in cytogenetic and molecular techniques. In the last decade traditional diagnostic approaches were supplemented with a significant number of reliable molecular diagnostic tools, detecting tumour type-specific genetic alterations. In addition, the successful application of some of these techniques to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue made it possible to subject a broader range of clinical material to molecular analysis. Thus, molecular genetics has already become an integral part of the work-up in some tumours, such as paediatric small blue round cell tumours, which demonstrate characteristic translocations. Several lines of evidence suggest that sarcomas can be divided into two major genetic groups: (i) sarcomas with specific genetic alterations and usually simple karyotypes, such as reciprocal chromosomal translocations (e.g. FUS-DDIT3 in myxoid liposarcoma) and specific oncogenic mutations (e.g. KIT mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours); and (i) sarcomas with non-specific genetic alterations and complex unbalanced karyotypes. Some of these genetic abnormalities, including chromosomal numerical changes, translocations, gene amplifications or large deletions can be apparent at the cytogenetic level (karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization), while others, such as small deletions, insertions or point mutations, require molecular genetic techniques (polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis). This review focuses on the applicability of genetic testing in the diagnosis and prognosis of soft tissue sarcomas, and gives a realistic appraisal of the ancillary role of molecular techniques, including its advantages and limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16359533     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02285.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  25 in total

1.  Expanded molecular profiling of myxofibrosarcoma reveals potentially actionable targets.

Authors:  Ellen Heitzer; Sandra Sunitsch; Magdalena M Gilg; Birgit Lohberger; Beate Rinner; Karl Kashofer; Nicole Stündl; Peter Ulz; Joanna Szkandera; Andreas Leithner; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  [Sarcoma gene signatures].

Authors:  F Chibon; J-M Coindre
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Role of genetic and molecular profiling in sarcomas.

Authors:  Scott M Norberg; Sujana Movva
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-05

4.  Soft tissue sarcoma clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Laurence H Baker; Derrick Beech; Robert Benjamin; Ephraim S Casper; Ernest U Conrad; Thomas F DeLaney; David S Ettinger; Martin J Heslin; Ray J Hutchinson; Krystyna Kiel; William G Kraybill; G Douglas Letson; James Neff; Richard J O'Donnell; I Benjamin Paz; Raphael E Pollock; R Lor Randall; Karen D Schupak; Douglas S Tyler; Margaret von Mehren; Jeffrey Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  Liposarcoma: a soft tissue tumor with many presentations.

Authors:  H J Mankin; K P Mankin; D C Harmon
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-07-22

Review 6.  Alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype and loss of ATRX expression in sarcomas.

Authors:  Xiaolei Ren; Chao Tu; Zhenchu Tang; Ruofei Ma; Zhihong Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  The comparative utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Khin Thway; Jayson Wang; Dorte Wren; Melissa Dainton; David Gonzalez; John Swansbury; Cyril Fisher
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Gene translocations in musculoskeletal neoplasms.

Authors:  Balaji Krishnan; Gaurav Khanna; Denis Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis is a helpful test for the diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Authors:  Marie Karanian; Gaëlle Pérot; Jean-Michel Coindre; Frédéric Chibon; Florence Pedeutour; Agnès Neuville
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  PIM-1 kinase expression in adipocytic neoplasms: diagnostic and biological implications.

Authors:  Min En Nga; Nu Nu Ma Swe; Kang Ting Chen; Liang Shen; Michael B Lilly; Siew Pang Chan; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Kakoli Das
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.