Literature DB >> 16359391

LEAFY, TERMINAL FLOWER1 and AGAMOUS are functionally conserved but do not regulate terminal flowering and floral determinacy in Impatiens balsamina.

Matthew Ordidge1, Tinashe Chiurugwi, Fiona Tooke, Nick H Battey.   

Abstract

In Impatiens balsamina a lack of commitment of the meristem during floral development leads to the continuous requirement for a leaf-derived floral signal. In the absence of this signal the meristem reverts to leaf production. Current models for Arabidopsis state that LEAFY (LFY) is central to the integration of floral signals and regulates flowering partly via interactions with TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) and AGAMOUS (AG). Here we describe Impatiens homologues of LFY, TFL1 and AG (IbLFY, IbTFL1 and IbAG) that are highly conserved at a sequence level and demonstrate homologous functions when expressed ectopically in transgenic Arabidopsis. We relate the expression patterns of IbTFL1 and IbAG to the control of terminal flowering and floral determinacy in Impatiens. IbTFL1 is involved in controlling the phase of the axillary meristems and is expressed in axillary shoots and axillary meristems which produce inflorescences, but not in axillary flowers. It is not involved in maintaining the terminal meristem in either an inflorescence or indeterminate state. Terminal flowering in Impatiens appears therefore to be controlled by a pathway that uses a different integration system than that regulating the development of axillary flowers and branches. The pattern of ovule production in Impatiens requires the meristem to be maintained after the production of carpels. Consistent with this morphological feature IbAG appears to specify stamen and carpel identity, but is not sufficient to specify meristem determinacy in Impatiens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16359391     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02607.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  5 in total

Review 1.  Floral initiation and inflorescence architecture: a comparative view.

Authors:  Reyes Benlloch; Ana Berbel; Antonio Serrano-Mislata; Francisco Madueño
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Revisiting the involvement of SELF-PRUNING in the sympodial growth of tomato.

Authors:  Johanna Thouet; Muriel Quinet; Sandra Ormenese; Jean-Marie Kinet; Claire Périlleux
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Interlocking feedback loops govern the dynamic behavior of the floral transition in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katja E Jaeger; Nick Pullen; Sergey Lamzin; Richard J Morris; Philip A Wigge
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Floral Reversion in Arabidopsis suecica Is Correlated with the Onset of Flowering and Meristem Transitioning.

Authors:  Amelia Asbe; Starr C Matsushita; Spencer Gordon; H E Kirkpatrick; Andreas Madlung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  SlGT11 controls floral organ patterning and floral determinacy in tomato.

Authors:  Liling Yang; Shilian Qi; Arfa Touqeer; Haiyang Li; Xiaolan Zhang; Xiaofeng Liu; Shuang Wu
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.