Literature DB >> 16359281

Long-term outcomes of a telephone intervention after an ICD.

Cynthia M Dougherty1, Elaine Adams Thompson, Frances Marcus Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term benefits of participating in a structured, 8-week educational telephone intervention delivered by expert cardiovascular nurses post-ICD. The intervention was aimed to (1) increase physical functioning, (2) increase psychological adjustment, (3) improve self-efficacy in managing the challenges of ICD recovery, and (4) lower levels of health care utilization over usual care in the first 12 months post-ICD. This article reports on the 6- and 12-month outcomes of the nursing intervention trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A two-group (N = 168) randomized control group design was used to evaluate intervention efficacy with persons receiving an ICD for the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Measures were obtained at baseline, 6 and 12 months post hospitalization. Outcomes included (1) physical functioning (Patient Concerns Assessment [PCA], Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], ICD shocks), (2) psychological adjustment (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI], Centers for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression [CES-D], fear of dying), (3) self-efficacy (Sudden Cardiac Arrest-Self-Efficacy [SCA-SE], Sudden Cardiac Arrest-Behavior [SCA-B], Sudden Cardiac Arrest-Knowledge [SCA-K]), and (4) health care utilization (emergency room [ER] visits, outpatient visits, hospitalizations). Using repeated measures ANOVA, the 6- and 12-month benefits of the intervention over usual care were in reductions in physical concerns (P = 0.006), anxiety (P = 0.04), and fear of dying (P = 0.01), with enhanced self-confidence (P = 0.04) and knowledge (P = 0.001) to manage ICD recovery. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on total outpatient visits, hospitalizations, or ER visits over 12 months.
CONCLUSION: A structured 8-week post-hospital telephone nursing intervention after an ICD had sustained 12-month improvements on patient concerns, anxiety, fear of dying, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Results may not apply to individuals with congestive heart failure who receive an ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16359281     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09500.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  24 in total

1.  Sleep quality and sleepiness in persons with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: outcome from a clinical randomized longitudinal trial.

Authors:  Selina Kikkenborg Berg; Melinda Higgins; Carolyn M Reilly; Jonathan J Langberg; Sandra B Dunbar
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Reliability and validity of the self-efficacy expectations and outcome expectations after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation scales.

Authors:  Cynthia M Dougherty; Sandra K Johnston; Elaine Adams Thompson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Kim M Nielsen; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Rod S Taylor; Jesper H Svendsen; Jane Lindschou; Lindsey Anderson; Janus C Jakobsen; Selina K Berg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

4.  Multisymptom Profile Predicts Increased Risk of Poor Outcomes After Initial Placement of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

Authors:  Megan M Streur; Elaine A Thompson; Cynthia M Dougherty
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 5.  Behavioral interventions in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: lessons learned and where to go from here?

Authors:  Mirela Habibović; Matthew M Burg; Susanne S Pedersen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Implementation, feasibility, and acceptability of quality of life therapy to improve positive emotions among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Allison J Carroll; Lillian M Christon; James R Rodrigue; Joseph L Fava; Michael B Frisch; Eva R Serber
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-04-14

7.  Development and testing of an intervention to improve outcomes for partners following receipt of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the patient.

Authors:  Cynthia M Dougherty; Elaine A Thompson; Peter J Kudenchuk
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.824

8.  Patient plus partner trial: A randomized controlled trial of 2 interventions to improve outcomes after an initial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Cynthia M Dougherty; Elaine A Thompson; Peter J Kudenchuk
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Effect of a psychoeducational intervention on depression, anxiety, and health resource use in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Sandra B Dunbar; Jonathan J Langberg; Carolyn M Reilly; Bindu Viswanathan; Frances McCarty; Steven D Culler; Marian C O'Brien; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 10.  Methodological limitations of psychosocial interventions in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) A systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.