Literature DB >> 16359193

Assessment of accuracy of disk diffusion tests for the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of common bovine mastitis pathogens: a novel approach.

Eyal Klement1, Marcelo Chaffer, Gabriel Leitner, Adin Shwimmer, Shmuel Friedman, Arthur Saran, Nahum Shpigel.   

Abstract

A novel approach was used to assess disk diffusion accuracy for determination of antibiotic susceptibility of various bovine mastitis pathogens (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus chromogenes, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae). MIC and disk diffusion diameters were compared for 587 bovine mastitis bacterial isolates collected in Israel and 3,186 drug-organism combinations. Results were analyzed by ROC curves, Bayesian statistics, and standard descriptive methods. Low correlation was observed between results of disk diffusion and MIC for S. dysgalactiae and all antimicrobial agents, S. aureus and erythromycin and neomycin, and E. coli and gentamicin, neomycin, and polymyxin B. On a few occasions in which correlation was satisfactory, accepted susceptibility breakpoints to some of the antimicrobial agents resulted in high discrepancies with MIC results and new breakpoints were suggested-e.g., 21 mm for S. aureus susceptibility to penicillin G instead of 29 mm recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and <21 mm, resistant, 21-25 mm, intermediate, and >25 mm, susceptible for susceptibility of E. coli to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Thus, this approach enabled determination of the most accurate breakpoints that best fitted the specific prevalence of susceptibility in Israel. Thus, we suggest its adoption by microbiology diagnostic laboratories for the provision of accurate antimicrobial susceptibility results when using the disk diffusion test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16359193     DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy assessment of Sensititre and agar disk diffusion for determining antimicrobial resistance profiles of bovine clinical mastitis pathogens.

Authors:  V Saini; R G M Olde Riekerink; J T McClure; H W Barkema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The LiaFSR system regulates the cell envelope stress response in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Prashanth Suntharalingam; M D Senadheera; Richard W Mair; Céline M Lévesque; Dennis G Cvitkovitch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Latent class comparison of test accuracy when evaluating antimicrobial susceptibility using disk diffusion and broth microdilution to test Escherichia coli and Mannheimia haemolytica isolates recovered from beef feedlot cattle.

Authors:  K M Benedict; S P Gow; R J Reid-Smith; C W Booker; T A McAllister; P S Morley
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 4.  Nanoparticles for treatment of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis.

Authors:  Samah Attia Algharib; Ali Dawood; Shuyu Xie
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.419

5.  Limitations of bacterial culture, viral PCR, and tulathromycin susceptibility from upper respiratory tract samples in predicting clinical outcome of tulathromycin control or treatment of bovine respiratory disease in high-risk feeder heifers.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sarchet; John P Pollreisz; David T Bechtol; Mitchell R Blanding; Roger L Saltman; Patrick C Taube
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antibacterial, Antibiofilm, and Antioxidant Activity of 15 Different Plant-Based Natural Compounds in Comparison with Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin.

Authors:  Ali Pormohammad; Dave Hansen; Raymond J Turner
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

7.  Methodological comparisons for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Sylvia Checkley; Calvin W Booker; Tim A McAllister; Paul S Morley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.741

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.