UNLABELLED: Extreme subcutaneous insulin resistance is a rare syndrome characterized by a severe resistance to subcutaneous (S/C) insulin together with persistence of normal or near normal intravenous (IV) insulin sensitivity. Its pathophysiology is unknown, although increased insulin degrading activity has been reported in the S/C adipose tissue fraction in some cases. Until now, proposed treatments have been disappointing. We report 4 cases who were successfully treated by intraperitoneal (IP) route. METHODS: The diagnosis of subcutaneous insulin resistance was based upon following combined conditions: resistance to hypoglycaemic action of subcutaneous insulin but normal or near normal sensitivity to IV or IP insulin. RESULTS: 4 patients among those followed by EVADIAC group met these criteria: 3 with type 1 diabetes (C peptide=0), the last one with unexplained non insulin-deficient diabetes (no anti-GAD antibodies, C peptide=5 ng/ml). All of them had been treated with subcutaneous insulin therapy without success despite huge doses (up to 4000 IU/day in two patients). The 3 type 1 diabetic patients presented with a history of repeated ketoacidosis episodes. A treatment of insulin mixed with aprotinin had been proposed to 2 patients without success. The IV insulin sensitivity was proved to be normal in two patients by euglycaemic clamp data. A skin biopsy was performed in 1 patient. An accumulation of insulin in the derma was revealed with no increase of degradation products of insulin. In these 4 patients, a dramatic improvement of diabetes control was obtained by IP insulin delivery from an implantable pump (HbA1c decrease by at least 3%). CONCLUSION: Although pathophysiology of the subcutaneous insulin resistance syndrome remains unexplained, our data show that intra-peritoneal insulin therapy from an implantable pump allows diabetes control in patients affected by this uncommon but severely disabling condition.
UNLABELLED: Extreme subcutaneous insulin resistance is a rare syndrome characterized by a severe resistance to subcutaneous (S/C) insulin together with persistence of normal or near normal intravenous (IV) insulin sensitivity. Its pathophysiology is unknown, although increased insulin degrading activity has been reported in the S/C adipose tissue fraction in some cases. Until now, proposed treatments have been disappointing. We report 4 cases who were successfully treated by intraperitoneal (IP) route. METHODS: The diagnosis of subcutaneous insulin resistance was based upon following combined conditions: resistance to hypoglycaemic action of subcutaneous insulin but normal or near normal sensitivity to IV or IP insulin. RESULTS: 4 patients among those followed by EVADIAC group met these criteria: 3 with type 1 diabetes (C peptide=0), the last one with unexplained non insulin-deficient diabetes (no anti-GAD antibodies, C peptide=5 ng/ml). All of them had been treated with subcutaneous insulin therapy without success despite huge doses (up to 4000 IU/day in two patients). The 3 type 1 diabeticpatients presented with a history of repeated ketoacidosis episodes. A treatment of insulin mixed with aprotinin had been proposed to 2 patients without success. The IV insulin sensitivity was proved to be normal in two patients by euglycaemic clamp data. A skin biopsy was performed in 1 patient. An accumulation of insulin in the derma was revealed with no increase of degradation products of insulin. In these 4 patients, a dramatic improvement of diabetes control was obtained by IP insulin delivery from an implantable pump (HbA1c decrease by at least 3%). CONCLUSION: Although pathophysiology of the subcutaneous insulin resistance syndrome remains unexplained, our data show that intra-peritoneal insulin therapy from an implantable pump allows diabetes control in patients affected by this uncommon but severely disabling condition.